I have the seen this message twice, with 2.66 GHz Intel core 2 Duo
running Snow Leopard (10.6.2), but restarting solves the problem. I
have wondered what might have caused it.-and the iMac is fairly new,
does not have memory intensive programs or do I run complex
scenarios.
No disruption
Half the kids I talk today don't know what a nibble is!
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 11:49 PM, Malcolm O'Brien
malcolmo2...@hotmail.comwrote:
That would have been the much later Tandy line of PC-compatibles. Windows
never ran on the CoCo.
You are correct, sir!
By the time Bill was touting the
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Robert Pangrazio rpangra...@gmail.com wrote:
Half the kids I talk today don't know what a nibble is!
I know what the QBASIC program is. :D Btw, it seems like I'm not the
only one who enjoyed that sample program--there's a clone of it
available for purchase in the
The system is smart enough to only take in as much as it can handle.
It's like plugging in any USB 2 device into it, it isn't going to try
and gulp all 480Mbits a second, it'll throttle the device to it's
managable 12MBytes a second, and not let anything pass.
Plugging in a 54Mbit per second
On 3/4/10 4:10 PM, Malcolm O'Brien wrote:
Isn't G faster than 1.1?
-
yes, but if you can add any sort of wifi to an older iMac, it doesnt
matter.
??? You're saying that feeding 54Mb to a 12Mb-capable port is fine?
He's saying it's not going to go faster then 12MBps.
It's called handshaking.
Just got a 2005 eMac! (Nice machine) :-)
Currently have a USB 2.0 eMac with the 2005's Tiger install on it.
The only thing that I could not get to work right on the USB eMac w/
the 2005's Tiger install was the fast user switching, which is not
much of a problem as my wife uses it mainly, only I
