On 12/14/10 9:50 AM, Joshua Juran wrote:
Frankly, I don't care if the list server sets a field suggesting that
replies go to the list or if your mail client honors that suggestion, as
long as (a) the field isn't Reply-To,
Viewing the source code of this message (similar to all others for LEM
I am a member of an advocacy group and I get much better results when
the messages I send are individually addressed than when they get
group sent. It appears impersonal and easily ignored.
What I would like to do is send the identical message but individually
addressed without creating the same
On 14/12/2010, at 3:32 PM, Tommy wrote:
> I am a member of an advocacy group and I get much better results when
> the messages I send are individually addressed than when they get
> group sent. It appears impersonal and easily ignored.
>
> What I would like to do is send the identical message b
On Dec 13, 2010, at 9:19 AM, Steven wrote:
On Dec 13, 2010, at 11:00 AM, Joshua Juran wrote:
That's a result of Reply-To pointing to the list, which is
inadvisable (for exactly this reason, i.e. accidentally sending
private replies to the list) and (as of RFC 2822 (April 2001)) not
standa
On Dec 13, 2010, at 9:41 AM, Bruce Johnson wrote:
On Dec 13, 2010, at 10:00 AM, Joshua Juran wrote:
That's a result of Reply-To pointing to the list, which is
inadvisable (for exactly this reason, i.e. accidentally sending
private replies to the list) and (as of RFC 2822 (April 2001)) not
