On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 6:54 PM, Waldemar Osuch
wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 5:56 PM, Randy Lent wrote:
>>
>> I am currently taking a class in Python. For the class, we are using
>> version 2.6. I have attempted to install the Python Imaging Library on two
>> different computers using th
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 5:56 PM, Randy Lent wrote:
> I am currently taking a class in Python. For the class, we are using
> version 2.6. I have attempted to install the Python Imaging Library on two
> different computers using this link
>
> http://effbot.org/downloads/PIL-1.1.6.win32-py2.6.exe
I am currently taking a class in Python. For the class, we are using version
2.6. I have attempted to install the Python Imaging Library on two different
computers using this link
http://effbot.org/downloads/PIL-1.1.6.win32-py2.6.exe
[cid:image001.png@01CA51A5.9DEC4040]
In both cases, the pil
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Ivan Mincik wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 8:33 PM, Laura & Edward Cannon
> wrote:
> > Hm.. you seem to be right. One thing you might do is im =
> > Image.open("test.png").convert("RGBA") which seems to solve the
> > transparency problem, at the expense of a s
Hm.. you seem to be right. One thing you might do is im =
Image.open("test.png").convert("RGBA") which seems to solve the
transparency problem, at the expense of a slightly larger image file.
Looking closer I think that PIL seems to support only RGB palettes
rather than RGBA palettes as does the PN
