I have a PC mail client that gets the following error:
Server did not respond Winsock error 10035 (0x2733)
What mail client is it? 10035 is a "Would block" call, which almost always
would indicate an error in the mail client. That means that the mail
client issued a Winsock command on a socket
What are messages without any Subject and "QUIT" as body?
They could be anything.
My guess is that they are E-mails that were sent by someone using telnet
rather than a standard mail client. QUIT is the command you use after you
send an E-mail, but if you forget to send a ".", the QUIT would a
I have a PC mail client that gets the following error:
Server did not respond Winsock error 10035 (0x2733)
It happens fairly frequently (it's Windows 2000 Professional) the ip configs are set
via dhcp, the dns server is correct and resolves/responds to the query for the mail
server.
Imail versi
What are messages without any Subject and "QUIT" as
body?
Mauro
To further what Karen said--you could use Imail Log Analyzer aid in your
search to see if the bulk are from one sender or one IP. If it is a
guessed password situation you could then either reset a password or
delete the account.
~Katie
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mail
Interesting you bring this. Mine is detecting, but it does not appear to
show the X-IMAIL-SPAM reason for most detections in the header. Is it
actually not running the spam filters (check the spam log) or is it not
inserting the headers so you are not catching it in the rules section?
I am on road
we are using imail 8.02
and today i found a funny "loop problem"
a customer was using following configuration on his mailaccount :
a forward-rule was set on :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the user "unknown" does'n exist
so imail moved the mail to the alias ->
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The last weekend i upgrade my server to the new patch 8.02 and i don't have
more spam detecteds emails...
All the traffic pass without be scanned for spam...
any help?
Thanks
Alessio
SICnet ISP
Argentina
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www
Possibly a guessed password? The logs should show if they are sending
using your server.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Drew Weaver
> Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 4:34 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Tens of
Sandy,
it didn't work.
Geza
At 10:54 PM 8/23/2003 Saturday -0400, you wrote:
> The filter is working according to my intentions...
Is it?
I believe you should have the AND statement as the last component of
the rule due to order-of-operations.
-Sandy
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/su
It Is set to relay for addresses.
In that case, I would check the IMail SMTP log file for all references to
>Received: from smtp0147.mail.yahoo.com [200.84.218.92] by
mail.hackmanframes.com with ESMTP
> (SMTPD32-8.02) id A4D91700F8; Mon, 25 Aug 2003 09:53:29 -0400
200.84.218.92, which should i
It Is set to relay for addresses.
Thanks,
-Drew
-Original Message-
From: R. Scott Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 3:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Tens of Thousands of .GSE files in my Spool dir ?
What you should immediately recogni
What you should immediately recognize from the D*.GSE file is that this is
spam. If you can't recognize that, you shouldn't be running a mailserver. :)
It *appears* that there is a spammer sending mail through your system. Either:
[1] thesurf.com (the target domain) is your domain, and the sp
Isn't GSE from mail1.exe?
Better start checking the Webmail logs and SMTP logs.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:IMail_Forum-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Drew Weaver
> Sent
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 14:29:52
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: "Postmaster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Undeliverable Mail
X-Mailer:
Unknown user: [EMAIL PROT
Anyone have any clue what would cause Tens of Thousands of .gse
files to pop into my spool directory, and no matter how many I delete they
don't ever stop generating? The logs basically just say "Processing
blablabla.gse" I cant figure out whats causing these messages.
Well, what are they?
Hello Jonathan,
BlackIce stops dictionary attacks. I agree with upstream FW as well.
Scott
Monday, August 25, 2003, 12:23:45 PM, you wrote:
Jonathan> Why not just run a real firewall upstream and off-load the work from your
Jonathan> Imail machine? I don't really see a point in exposing it to
Maybe, though a vlan or such may be a better way .. or just pop it onto a
dedicated interface on the firewall. :)
Jonathan
At 08:40 PM 8/25/2003 +0200, you wrote:
well the only reason i see to use this is to protect form other servers
within the same network
-Original Message-
From: [E
Anyone have any clue what would cause Tens of Thousands of .gse
files to pop into my spool directory, and no matter how many I delete they
don't ever stop generating? The logs basically just say "Processing
blablabla.gse" I cant figure out whats causing these messages.
I'm literally making
Yes saw it with Windows ME and eudora 5.*
Enable DNS on the workstation network setup.
Michael Ryan
Ryan Computer Services
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Barnett
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 12:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [
well the only reason i see to use this is to protect form other servers within the
same network
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonathan
Sent: 25. august 2003 20:24
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] OT: BlackIce Firewall
W
Why not just run a real firewall upstream and off-load the work from your
Imail machine? I don't really see a point in exposing it to the world, even
with a software filter ..
Jonathan
At 08:14 PM 8/25/2003 +0300, you wrote:
X-Outbound Test-Failures: IPNOTINMX, FILTER-WHITE
X-Outbound Test-Weig
X-Outbound Test-Failures: IPNOTINMX, FILTER-WHITE
X-Outbound Test-Weight: -30
X-Note: Intended recipient(s): [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Note: Sent from mail.moragg.com ([62.219.165.29]).
X-Note: This E-mail has been scanned for spam and viruses.
X-Note: Please send abuse reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Prece
Does this use SMTP VRFY as the verification mechanism?
It should use MAIL FROM.
If so, does that
imply that "Disable SMTP VRFY" on the remote server would cause this to fail
as a reasonable verification test? If so, does anyone even use this?
No -- most servers do not allow VRFY, so it can't be u
Please help me to ensure I understand the validation tests.
>From the IMail 8 manual: Verify MAIL FROM Address. Verifies the address
passed in the "MAIL FROM" command. The connecting SMTP server is contacted
to verify that the user exists. If the user does not exist the message is
identified as sp
Filtering filenames without "" is prone to false positives, as you see from
the following html mail content example.
It's a catch-22.
If you filter without the "", you're prone to false positives. *But*, if
you filter with the "", you're prone to false negatives (not catching
attachments that
Filtering filenames without "" is prone to false positives, as you see from
the following html mail content example.
[*** snipped out several lines of html code here ***]
THE COMMON NAME OF THIS CERTIFICATE: =
WWW.EXAMPLE.COM
You could try a syntax like this, catching filenames up to 100 charac
Barbara,
First:
> 08:18 16:00 SMTP-(0CF82217) [E] Send direct is disabled and no
gateway is specified!
Never seen this message before, but it seems to indicate some
'problem' with the SMTP configuration. Either specify a gateway (mail
server that will deliver email) or enable the Send Direct (unc
Thanks. I was beginning to think no one was listening.
Matt
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel Donnelly
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 4:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Digest Mode
Matt,
That error could be c
Monday, August 25, 2003 you wrote:
I> There should be a way to filter just the attachment itself, and not
I> the entire rest of the message.
Attachments aren't separate from the message but a part of the
message. So the message has to be parsed into the various segments.
Segments themselv
Pushing a tool to its limits? I'd like to see the limits expanded a bit
then :)
There should be a way to filter just the attachment itself, and not the
entire rest of the message.
That would be exceedingly useful.
In the mean time I'll just have remove the *.com filter and leave the others
presen
Well lets see.. at my little spot in the world he (spammers) steals over 900
dollars a month. 600 for bandwidth and 300 in labor. That bandwidth could
of been used for other services let alone the labor wasted controlling spam.
~Rick
I didn't see exactly where he 'stole'.
As I said, unless he'
is in the manual at http://www.ipswitch.com
sorry short on time.
~Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bjørn Nornes
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 2:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Rules.ima only works on top level domain
Screw him! The lying SOB will just open up somewhere else. Now if the
article had said he had gotten run over by a bus THAT would be good news.
David Daniels
System administrator
Starfish Internet Service
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Rick Klinge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <
Recently, webmail users complain about a broken webmail interface, showing
the following content at varying places within the web interface (most
common are left navigating area, "from" column and "trashbin" column):
<---
Anyone with a batch file to copy rules.ima from top directory
to all domains directiory ?
mvh
Bjørn Nornes
Driftansvarlig ASP
Bragd AS
tlf : 70 16 06 60
fax : 70 16 06 51
mob: 90 17 34 43
http:/www.bragd.no/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On B
> Is there a way to have the Rules set up in IMail 6.06 to Forward The
> messages to an external e-mail account?
Covered all over the archives and earlier this week. Redirect to a
mailbox, then forward from the mailbox (.FWD) to the
external address.
-Sandy
--
> I think I need to add the own ip address (plus 127.0.0.1) of the
> Imail server to the trusted IP addresses, because McAfee Webshield
> from the same server would send me messages in case of a virus
> outbreak...
You do not want to trust 127.0.0.1 if that is the IP address that
I didn't see exactly where he 'stole'.
As I said, unless he's explicitly breaking the law... If he is, then
that's different. Then those empowered with enforcing those laws should
perform their job.
Currently, I am not aware of any legislation where receiving unwanted
inbound email is 'steali
Wow.. poor guy actually felt bad about sending spam. Hmm.. I wonder if he
feels bad enough to pay the email admins labor and loss of bandwidth that
had stole from? Isn't stealing illegal around the world?
~Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
Anyone operating within the confines of the law should not have to worry
about the safety of his children as the result of doing business.
I despise that kind of news.
>>New Zealand does not have specific anti-spam laws.
Hmm.
Spammer or not. Unless he is explicitly breaking the law, the probl
41 matches
Mail list logo
