RE: [IMail Forum] RAR Virus

2005-03-04 Thread Mark Novak
William, Clamav just updated their signatures and it looks like it will now catch this virus. I was getting these as well this morning, but mine had an executable inside the archive. Thanks, Mark Novak [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: [IMail Forum] RAR Virus

2005-03-04 Thread Andrew P. Kaplan
the desktop, either. They are pretty obviously viruses with .rar attachments and a blank body though. Anyone have a clue why this virus is not being stopped, or any clue as to how to stop it, other than blocking all .rar files (not easy to do with Imail). Thanks. all rar files should be deleted,

Re: [IMail Forum] RAR Virus

2005-03-04 Thread Matrosity Tech Support
I meant 'suppport' William Van Hefner wrote: All, I was just wondering if anyone out there has noticed a bunch of these .rar viruses today? I've seen users get a couple of these this morning. They are not detected by the mail server, which uses MxGuard to scan with F-Prot and CLAM AV, and Norton di

Re: [IMail Forum] RAR Virus

2005-03-04 Thread Matrosity Tech Support
I think I got one addressed to 'supppot'? William Van Hefner wrote: All, I was just wondering if anyone out there has noticed a bunch of these .rar viruses today? I've seen users get a couple of these this morning. They are not detected by the mail server, which uses MxGuard to scan with F-Prot and

[IMail Forum] RAR Virus

2005-03-04 Thread William Van Hefner
All, I was just wondering if anyone out there has noticed a bunch of these .rar viruses today? I've seen users get a couple of these this morning. They are not detected by the mail server, which uses MxGuard to scan with F-Prot and CLAM AV, and Norton didn't detect it when my mail client downloade

Re: [IMail Forum] Please Help

2005-03-04 Thread Rod Dorman
On Thursday, March 3, 2005, 12:48:21, Troy Hilton wrote: > There ought to be a way to deal with these type of issues in a legal > manner. To list someone because they *Might* be a spammer, then to > require a dollar payment to resolve the issue is absurd. That's going > too far. If there is no evid

Re: [IMail Forum] mail sent to nul - no rules.ima

2005-03-04 Thread E. Shanbrom \(Ipswitch\)
I would do a search for *.ima in the IMail directory and any users directory not under IMail and see what turns up...It could be a user level rule Eric S - Original Message - From: "Andrew P. Kaplan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 8:10 AM Subject: RE: [IMail Forum]

RE: [IMail Forum] HELP

2005-03-04 Thread Eric Parsons
I have this same problem and reported it AOL postmaster @ 215537 seems that they are having issues with there servers that are on the 172.x.x.x network connecting to other servers. Eric -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: T

RE: [IMail Forum] mail sent to nul - no rules.ima

2005-03-04 Thread Andrew P. Kaplan
Quoting "John Tolmachoff (Lists)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Uh, Andrew, we received the 1st one. 4 more after that will not get an > answer any faster. > > Sorry, my web client was screwed up. Sorry about that. I said sh!t when I saw the extra messages. But I do hope I get an answer. Thanks. Andrew

RE: [IMail Forum] mail sent to nul - no rules.ima

2005-03-04 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Uh, Andrew, we received the 1st one. 4 more after that will not get an answer any faster. John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:IMail_Forum- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew P. Kaplan > Sent: Thursday, Ma