Can you spell Lobbyist and campaign contributions? What could it have
been that motivated the majority of the Senate Communications
Committee to ignore the "Net Neutrality" amendment to the
Communications Bill, when it had no adverse impact and was consumer
driven? Just coincidentally, of course,
There's a great book I just finished, albeit somewhat one-sided in its
viewpoint, called, "The Rape of Ma Bell". It tells the real story about how
the Justice Department started the breakup of the original AT&T back in the
early 50s, under the Eisenhower Administration and they successfully fought
Dave Doherty wrote:
SBC bought ATT and then changed their name to ATT. So ATT doesn't
exist any longer. What is now called ATT is really SBC.
Not that it makes a lot of difference, except to lawyers and tax
people...
And the people who think AT&T bought SBC and will fix 'em.
AT&T's reputat
SBC bought ATT and then changed their name to ATT. So ATT doesn't exist any
longer. What is now called ATT is really SBC.
Not that it makes a lot of difference, except to lawyers and tax people...
- Original Message -
From: "Greg Shepherd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday
Ok, for those of us who are running IMail, and not ICS, what are our
options when it comes to WGS? If it's not included with the program,
why do all the webmail contacts use a .mdb file? Further, how do we
make changes to it when we need to?
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/ma
Running v8.22
Greg
-Original Message-
From: Peter Richards [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 1:03 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject:RE: [IMail Forum] White Listing Problem
I didn't see if you were running ICS or imail 8.x but I am running 8
Dnsrbl.rms has found one or two emails NOT on other today.
I do not think you whitelist the IP Address unless you add it to ip relay list,
right?
Greg
-Original Message-
From: Adam Campbell [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 1:09 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswit
The whitelist deals with the mailfrom and not the ehlo, right?
Have you whitelisted the IP address?
Also, do the dnsbl.rmc and rhsbl.rmc services mentioned in the spam log work
well?
adamc
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Shepherd
Se
I didn't see if you were running ICS or imail 8.x but I am running 8.2 and
have this same problem
Where the white list is arbitrarily adherered to and html filtering takes
place regardless.
This seems to happen more frequently with the premium antispam switch turned
on.
-Original Message
Hi Greg,
I made the experience, that the html filtering does not honor the white list
all the time. I have no explanation to this.
Am Mittwoch, 12. Juli 2006 um 18:34 schrieben Sie:
> I am trying to white list a domain that has subscribed service wit
I am trying to white list a domain that has subscribed service with an
automated mail service for quotes. I have 5 of 8 for HTML Filtering to
drive spam. The Tags checked are
1.) Nested Tables
2.) Hyper Links
3.) Invalid Tag
4.) Mail to Hyperlink
5.) Deceptive URL
6.) Embedded Comments
7.) Depec
Title: ICS standard 25 users license
What I found out is, that the mail stuck in spool, when I
turned on spam filtering.
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Ted
NicholsGesendet: Mittwoch, 12. Juli 2006 17:15An:
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comBetreff: RE: [IMail Fo
Title: ICS standard 25 users license
The log file shows "[!s!] 452 Too many recipients
!s!" when starting the services. What does this
mean?
20060712 160757 127.0.0.1 SMTP () ok to run20060712
160758 127.0.0.1 SMTPD () [x] official name
gabler-st
Title: ICS standard 25 users license
The
fact that the view queue shows 0 files means that the files stuck in the queue
are not recognized as deliverable. Most likely this is because the T file was
never renamed to a Q. What you can try is to go to the spool folder in a
DOS prompt and do
SBC bought AT&T and took the AT&T name. The plan for Whittaker, the head of
SBC, is to recreate the old Bell System again.
(former Bell System employee)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Shepherd
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 09:58
T
Remember SBC and ATT have joined forces! I am not sure who brought who.
Greg Shepherd
-Original Message-
From: Travis Rabe [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 10:54 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject:Re: [IMail Forum] worldnet
<< File: ATT0
Even their DNS report is different today...odd indeedsomeone is making changes over there.TOn 7/12/06, Travis Rabe <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:They must be doing some major changes over there. Their DNS query for MX records has changed today. Now it returns info differently.ver
They must be doing some major changes over there. Their DNS query for MX records has changed today. Now it returns info differently.very odd. Maybe they are combining stuff with SBC??; <<>> DiG 9.3.2
<<>> @192.168.10.5 worldnet.att.net mx; (1 server found);; global options: printcmd;; Got
They must be doing some major changes over there. Their DNS query for MX records has changed today. Now it returns info differently.very odd. Maybe they are combining stuff with SBC??; <<>> DiG 9.3.2
<<>> @192.168.10.5 worldnet.att.net mx; (1 server found);; global options: printcmd;; Got
Title: ICS standard 25 users license
If I remember correctly, you can have as
many domains as you want with up to 25 accounts under each domain. The
license is misleading. There was a discussion on this a year or so
ago. I think one user reported they had around 100 users with a 25 user
We have the same issue with ATT and our forward and reverse are
both correct.
Tuesday, July 11, 2006, 3:02:18 PM, Sandeep Agarwal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
SA>
SA>
SA> ATT WorldNet guys do the reverse PTR check and that may be the
SA> issue. Search on Google for Reverse PTR entry for more
Luck.
Tuesday, July 11, 2006, 12:57:28 PM, Matrosity Hosting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
MH>
MH> Any ideas on the Gmail getting through?
MH>
MH> Travis Rabe wrote:
MH> It will be a hit and miss with a 450 error.
MH>
MH>
MH> DNSReport shows problems on their end as well
MH>
MH>
Switch them to a POP box on your server. That's the only cure we
found.
Tuesday, July 11, 2006, 12:26:09 PM, Matrosity Hosting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
MH>
MH> We can't seem to be able to deliver email to worldnet.att.net
MH> and I can't understand why. Our logs show that their server is
Title: ICS standard 25 users license
Hello,
A customer of us has an ICS standard 25 users license. He created more than 30 accounts on 3 domains (2 of them virtual). No warning or error was displayed when creating more than 25 accounts.
Now some mails stuck in the spool dir. Some other ma
I'm not a graphics guru but a quick edit of these files
removes obvious ipswitch marketing. As well as reducing a 38 kb login
image to 8 kb. You could easily add your own graphics to this but it's
generic now. Drop these into your drive letter appropriate X:\Program
Files\Ipswitch\IMail\WebDir\
25 matches
Mail list logo
