I've heard there is even a covert plot by ATT et al to kidnap and
ransom Vint Cerf and Al Gore. Now, I'd be willing to donate to that
ransom, provided they agreed to keep both of them.
Obviously, you have no clue. The covert plot is actually a cover for a top
secret take over attempt of the
Bruce Barnes wrote:
There's a great book I just finished, albeit somewhat one-sided in its
viewpoint, called, The Rape of Ma Bell. It tells the real story about how
the Justice Department started the breakup of the original ATT back in the
early 50s, under the Eisenhower Administration and
You guys can rage against the machine all you
want but all I wanna do us get email to their system.
Ronald E. Kushner wrote:
Bruce
Barnes wrote:
There's a great book I just finished, albeit
somewhat one-sided in its
viewpoint, called, "The Rape of Ma Bell". It tells the real
Good morning everyone!
Running 8.22 Using the internal/registry based method
for storing domain and user information. Does the external database option
store all that info in the database or just the user information? Meaning does
the domain information stay in the registry?
Thank
domains and aliases are stored in registry
Atentament,
Pere Ginabreda
Servei Tecnic - Microtech Sistemas, S.L.
http://www.microtech.cat http://www.microtech.cat/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] nombre de
Hello,
I
have been using ICS Premium Edition from past couple of months and I have found
that the Symantec Scan Engine is not good enough to block virus infected
emails. There are lots of virus infected emails being received from outside. I
was using MxGuard with F-Prot antivirus
That's the whole point, Ron!
If ATT has their way, they will literally establish toll roads for good
connectivity, surcharging for access to whatever they deem good stuff on
the net. Do a Google search on net neutrality and read about what's going
on in Congress right now. Whitaker (SBC ATT),
I use IMGate with ClamAV
Christopher Checca
Packard Transport, Inc.
IT Department
24021 South Municipal Dr
PO Box 380
Channahon, IL. 60410
815 467 9260
815 467 6939 Fax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.packardtransport.com
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
I haven't seen a problem using Mxguard at all so I'm
wondering what kind of server/load you're running?
Nitesh (Ipswitch Mailing List Member) wrote:
Hello,
I
have been using ICS Premium Edition from past couple of months and I
have found
that the Symantec Scan Engine
Hi,
We're using mxGuard too, but it doesn't use memory as you described. Be sure, that you use the latest version of mxGuard which is version 2.4.
IMail does not support any other antivirus software as a plugin like BitDefender and Symantec.
Am
Hi,
see topic. Using the web administration interface I can paste text
containing umlauts like ä,ü,ö into the vacation message memo. But as
soon as I hit the Save button all umlauts are removed from the message.
Anyone else experiencing this behavior?
--
Elektronik-Labor Carls GmbH Co. KG
I have one domain that this morning started to get blocked by comcast.
07:13 10:50 SMTP-(0399) 550-IP.ADD.res.ss blocked by
ldap:ou=rblmx,dc=comcast,dc=net
07:13 10:50 SMTP-(0399) 550 Comcast does not support the direct
connection to its mail servers from residential IPs. Your mail should
Chuck
Not sure if this is the same issue, but last week I began having problems with
verizon then sbc then att.
I don't know if Comcast is with that bunch, but.
They started blocking on my email address domain. By that I mean in Outlook,
for example,
the user entered email address. I know
I cannot send to Comcast ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) from my server running on a
residential Comcast IP. I get the same error in my logs.
This shouldn't be happening to you though, unless you have a 24.* IP
address.
George
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
George E. Dailey wrote:
I cannot send to Comcast ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) from my server running on a
residential Comcast IP. I get the same error in my logs.
This shouldn't be happening to you though, unless you have a 24.* IP
address.
I don't think they can block 24.*, I used to do that and
John:
Did that test and it is not the issue. They are definitely blocking the IP
address.
Does anyone know if comcast is blocking generic reverse dns entries?
Chuck Schick
Warp 8, Inc.
(303)-421-5140
www.warp8.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
550 Comcast does not support the direct connection to its mail
servers from residential IPs. Your mail should be sent to
comcast.net users through your ISP.
Their policy is very clear for an SMTP custom reject text. Congrats
to them for clarity.
It seems like from what you say, their list
Len:
That is assuming that is the reason for their blocking that IP - I remain
suspicious. The confusing thing to me is they are blocking a single IP out
of an entire Class C - other domains in that class C are sending just fine.
btw, the Knicks might also have to pay Larry Brown up to $40
Even though the language is clear, it would not be the first time an error
message gave the wrong reason for the error.
This might be the old multiple-HELO-responses-from-the-same IP issue.
Comcast is among those who object to this feature of IMail. I had this
problem with them and got them
19 matches
Mail list logo
