This was the response I received after explaining to their tech support
what I discovered from this list and asking if IMAIL had a fix
"Microsoft broke HTML standards with that stationary.
At present there's nothing we can do to fix it, other than forwarding
the message back to yourself or c
I updated to 7.15 after seeing that thread earlier. No change.
Sheathing sword for battle axe..
And I've just installed sp2 for Office XP. No change.
Perhaps we need Ouzies!
Sharyn
We are the worldwide producer and marketer of the award winning Cruzan
Single Barrel Rum, judged "Best i
I updated to 7.15 after seeing that thread earlier. No change. Sheathing
sword for battle axe..
Kurt
- Original Message -
From: "Sharyn Schmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: March 26, 2003 2:08 PM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Weird web mess
On Wednesday, March 26, 2003, 14:58:48, Sharyn Schmidt wrote:
SS> I'll wave my sword with you, Kurt, as we stand shoulder to shoulder
SS> yelling Death to HTML emails.
SS> Got a solution???
I often refer people to http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "The avalanche
So, the next question is, has anyone patched to 7.15 and is still seeing
this stationary problem?
Sharyn
We are the worldwide producer and marketer of the award winning Cruzan
Single Barrel Rum, judged "Best in the World" at the annual
San Francisco Wine and Spirits Championships. For
more info
Death to HTML emails!! (sorry, got carried away there...)
Kurt
I'll wave my sword with you, Kurt, as we stand shoulder to shoulder
yelling Death to HTML emails.
Got a solution???
:)
I emailed Ipswitch about this and they told me to install the 7.15
patch. I don't see how that will h
" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: March 26, 2003 12:08 PM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Weird web messaging behaviour
> We have found with certain "stationary" the client will put in a tag
> like:. In an HTML parser this will look like a
"title&quo
We have found with certain "stationary" the client will put in a tag
like:. In an HTML parser this will look like a
"title" tag that is never closed. IN the View source do a search for
title. for every it finds there should be a closing tag
as well for it to be considered valid HTML. Not all st
valid HTML. Not all style sheets (.css's) do this.
Eric S
- Original Message -
From: "Sharyn Schmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 12:32 PM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Weird web messaging behaviour
>
>
> What
What does it look like if you do a view source on the message? Does it
work ok from a mail client? What do the message headers say?
Ok..I was able to duplicate this rather quickly this time, by using one
of the messages that a user sent me that didn't show up in someone
else's web messaging.
H
What does it look like if you do a view source on the message? Does it
work ok from a mail client? What do the message headers say?
It works fine when I view it with an email client.
I am going to have to work on creating the problem again as I went ahead
and removed all my messages from the se
Subject: [IMail Forum] Weird web messaging behaviour
> Sometimes, when a message is sent from Outlook XP, in html format, and
> is viewed in webmessaging, the entire body of the message is blank. The
> From, Date, To and Subject line are fine.
>
> This used to happen with the ol
Sometimes, when a message is sent from Outlook XP, in html format, and
is viewed in webmessaging, the entire body of the message is blank. The
From, Date, To and Subject line are fine.
This used to happen with the older versions of IMAIL, but instead of
being blank, it would come out coded/garbled
13 matches
Mail list logo
