Yes that mailbox probly takes a very long time to open, I found a user today
who has an 800MB mailbox with 8900 messages in it, she was complaining about
the speed. I said clean out your inbox
The mailbox file is a flat text file it the bigger it is the longer it takes
to open, same as trying to o
Thanks. I figured. Stupid me for not setting a limit. Now it got out of
control.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Chris Patterson
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 3:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] webmail performance
This
This will always be an issue with a mailbox large in size.
Fragmentation will greatly amplify the issue.
Thanks,
Chris Patterson, CCNA
Network Engineer
Rapid Systems
-Original Message-
From: Robert Perez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 3:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTEC
Man, I wish you would have posted this a couple hours earlier. I could have
included that in the survey. If I add it now, it will throw of the
statistics.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 7:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Webmail Performance
I feel your pain, but with us running 7.15 on a win2k amd XP2000 with
256 pc133 ram and a single 15k rpm ultra scsi 36 gig drive, Declude
virus/junkmail and fprot, I can open up a 50 meg ma
Just a note if you are running SSL on IMAIL. They are based on OpenSSL.
I will give them a call in the morning to see if their implamentation is at
risk. I did verify with them they are using OpenSSL for the SSL portion of
the IMail server.
Kevin Bilbee
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
CERT
platform.
>
> ~Rick
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mohd Izham
> Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 7:02 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Webmail Performance
>
>
> previously i&#
> Well I'm not trying to shake the tree here.. but 1 gig a ram? what other
> micro$oft services to you have running? IIS? Indexing service? etc etc..
> fwiw, and imho.. 1gb of ram is just enough to make windows (servers all)
> idle smooth.. and flat line at about 1/4 throttle. bump the ram up to
good start.
-Jay
-Original Message-
From: Rick Klinge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 7:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Webmail Performance
Well I'm not trying to shake the tree here.. but 1 gig a ram? what
other
micro$oft servi
PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mohd Izham
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 7:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Webmail Performance
previously i'm having the problem when i've migrated from 6.06 to 7.15. i'm
running P Xeon 2.4Ghz, 1GB RAM, 64GB HDD. when the server is idle
: "The AreaTech Team" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, 02 October 2003 07:42 AM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Webmail Performance
> I feel your pain, but with us running 7.15 on a win2k amd XP2000 with
> 256 pc133 ram and a single 15k rpm ultra
s
> Web hosting, Email outsourcing, Dedicated and shared
> infrastructure solutions.
> (949) 584-1514
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jason Newland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 1:16 PM
>
Message -
From: "Jason Newland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 1:16 PM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Webmail Performance
> It seems that the original post mentioned that this issue included 7.x and
> 8.x. Since it is clea
disabling, you may be
required to do this on a different machine and start fresh, adding services
1 by 1.
Jason
- Original Message -
From: "Ryan Bohn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 1:28 PM
Subject: Re: [IMail Foru
From: "Dermot Keenan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 11:03 AM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Webmail Performance
Ryan, what OS are you running IMail on? We had a similar configuration -
dual 2.4GHz Xeon with 2.5GB RAM running W
that ipswitch has become irrelevant, unable, and
unwilling to provide quality support.
We are looking into migrating to other mail server software.
Ryan Bohn
Sys Admin & Tech Support
- Original Message -
From: "Rick Leske" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECT
switch has become irrelevant, unable, and unwilling to
provide quality support.
We are looking into migrating to other mail server software.
Ryan Bohn
Sys Admin & Tech Support
- Original Message -
From: "Rick Leske" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wed
ing to
provide quality support.
We are looking into migrating to other mail server software.
Ryan Bohn
Sys Admin & Tech Support
- Original Message -
From: "Rick Leske" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 9:08 AM
Subject:
At 11:08 01/10/2003 -0500, you wrote:
Dell, 1.8 Xeon, 73G HDD 1G Ram
OS: W2K SP3
Services:
Imail services
Sybase (Internal messaging database - 80 users)
ISA Server (Proxy - 80 users)
100 baseT Ethenet internal network
If I connect to webmail on the IMail server, it is still slow.
The only Web us
Could you be a little more specific.. what server hardware/configuration is
it running on? Any other server services running in conjunction with
IMail.. what is your internet bandwidth (at the server). Is it a client
concern or is the server actually running slow?
~Rick
> This is a far more
Reply to: Chris Moore
Re: [IMail Forum] Webmail Performance on Wednesday 5:04:25 AM
This is a far more serious problem than Ipswitch has given attention
too. After numerous calls to support and many messages here I still do
not have a solution to this. I have tried many things and
21 matches
Mail list logo
