re: IMAP tag case sensitivity

2002-11-05 Thread Mark Crispin
On Tue, 5 Nov 2002 07:45:45 -0800 (PST), Mark Crispin wrote: > All IMAP tokens (as opposed to strings such as user name, password, mailbox > name, etc.) are case-insensitive. However, with that in mind, I don't think that a server should change the case of tags. c-client (used by Pine) avoids the

re: IMAP tag case sensitivity

2002-11-05 Thread Mark Crispin
All IMAP tokens (as opposed to strings such as user name, password, mailbox name, etc.) are case-insensitive.

Re: IMAP tag case sensitivity

2002-11-05 Thread Arnt Gulbrandsen
> C: a fetch 1 uid > C: A fetch 2 uid > S: * 1 fetch (uid 1) > S: a ok > S: A 2 fetch (uid 2) This line should be "S: * 2 fetch (uid 2)". Sorry. > S A ok --Arnt

IMAP tag case sensitivity

2002-11-05 Thread Arnt Gulbrandsen
Hi, I always took it for granted that the tag in IMAP is case sensitive. All the implementations I've seen treat it as such. However, I looked it up today and couldn't find anything. Am I overlooking something? Which, if any, of these two are legal? C: a fetch 1 uid C: A fetch 2 uid S: * 1 fet

re: ipv6?

2002-11-05 Thread Mark Crispin
On Tue, 5 Nov 2002 11:43:01 +0100 (CET), =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Peter_L=F6fkvist?= wrote: > Question: Does, the on the home page linked, imap-2002.RC10 support ipv6? > I saw that Peter Derr made a patch to 2002.RC1, but I didn't see any signs > of IPv6 in the 2002.RC10. If not, is there a patch one could g

ipv6?

2002-11-05 Thread Peter Löfkvist
Hi guys! Question: Does, the on the home page linked, imap-2002.RC10 support ipv6? I saw that Peter Derr made a patch to 2002.RC1, but I didn't see any signs of IPv6 in the 2002.RC10. If not, is there a patch one could get hold of? Help much appreciated. /Peter --