Re: LFS - how?

2002-07-08 Thread Terry Davis
I think I tried this once. It did not work. I will try again. :| On Mon, 2002-07-08 at 16:02, Matti Aarnio wrote: > On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 10:11:19PM -0500, Terry Davis wrote: > > I am running linux 2.4.9. I would like to have mail objects larger than > > 2 GB. How

Re: LFS - how?

2002-07-08 Thread Terry Davis
I meant 'folders'. Each object contains a lot of individual emails. I am using the MBX format. I have heard you have to compile it to support lfs and I dont have the first clue about that. On Mon, 2002-07-08 at 14:29, Tim Showalter wrote: > On Sun, 2002-07-07 at 20:11, Terr

LFS - how?

2002-07-07 Thread Terry Davis
I am running linux 2.4.9. I would like to have mail objects larger than 2 GB. How can I get this? thank you, -- Terry Davis http://approbation.org/ -- - For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http

imapd not using 'mail' in syslog

2002-05-21 Thread Terry Davis
into the maillog file only? -- Terry Davis http://approbation.org/ -- - For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/imap/imap-list.html -

pam_mkhomedir - works for pop3d not imapd

2002-05-17 Thread Terry Davis
Hello, Anyone have an idea as to why the pam_mkhomedir module works for ipop3d and not imapd? Thank you for any help! -- Terry Davis http://approbation.org/ -- - For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see

Re: Backends and Formats

2002-05-12 Thread Terry Davis
> > >I have been experiencing (under numerous clients - OE, Mozilla, Outlook2K, >Squirrel) I've experienced lost email quite regularly. Hence my comment. > > Might be helpful to turn on some very verbose logging and see WHY this is happening ... #!/bin/sh tee /var/log/imapd/imapd-$USER-$$-in

large file support - linux

2002-03-26 Thread Terry Davis
Hello, I have learned that one must compile uw-imap correctly to enable lfs. Simply compiling it with '-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE' does not work. Must I change the open calls as well. Has someone done this successfully? Thank you for any help! -- Terry

re: Fwd: solaris 8 x86 PADL and uw imap

2002-03-21 Thread Terry Davis
t; > > (if so how?) > > I have no idea what padl is. However, on Solaris, you should use > PASSWDTYPE=pmb instead of PASSWDTYPE=pam because Solaris has a broken > implementation of PAM. -- Terry Davis http://approbation.org/