Dear Arnt,
We can do that, but what is about older version compatibility by latest IMAP servers.
Arnt Gulbrandsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Gangadhar Mylapuram writes:> Dear Arnt,>> The client, which was developed with IMAP4(rfc1730), wants to connect > to the UW IMAP server (supports IMAPver4re
Gangadhar Mylapuram writes about upgrading from RFC1730 to 2060/3501:
We can do that, but what is about older version compatibility by
latest IMAP servers.
I've read this list continuously for at least five years, and it hasn't
been a problem in that time.
I personally believe that very few IMAP
Hi everybody,
I am using UW IMAP ver4rev1 server. It is not supporting PARTIAL command which is specified in IMAP ver4(rfc1730).
Is UW IMAP ver4rev1 server supports rfc1730 commands?
Which RFCs has to be considered while developing IMAPservers/clients?
Can anybody clear this lower version
Dear Arnt,
The client, which was developed with IMAP4(rfc1730), wants to connect to the UW IMAP server (supports IMAPver4rev1). In this case server has to support a command like PARTIAL(even it is obsleted). In my observation I found that UW IMAP server is not supporting this command.
I want to
Gangadhar Mylapuram writes:
Which RFCs has to be considered while developing IMAPservers/clients?
3501, 2595, 2683 and the specifications for whatever IMAP extensions you
use/support.
--Arnt
Gangadhar Mylapuram writes:
Dear Arnt,
The client, which was developed with IMAP4(rfc1730), wants to connect
to the UW IMAP server (supports IMAPver4rev1). In this case server
has to support a command like PARTIAL(even it is obsleted).
That's fairly easy: Either you can download a ten-year-old v
