Hi,
I have an IMAP server (2007k, 2007.398) running on a rather old
hardware. I see that delivering new messages with tmail to mix
mailboxes with 4+ messages can take several seconds (about 5-6s).
Delivering to a small mailbox takes about 0.1- 0.3 on that hardware.
Has anybody else
Title: Untitled Document
Pawel,
Yes, we have seen the same problem here. We thought that converting to
mix boxes would have helped the situation considerably. We used to use
mbx format. However, much to our surprise, we still see very heavy IO
when delivering messages with tmail to large mix
Yes, I am aware of a performance problem when adding a message to a large
mailbox. The entire index and status file is always rewritten.
You are not the only person to have complained about this problem. The
focus on my efforts had been to make mix as reliable as possible. Now, my
focus is
Hi,
I've been following the DEV versions pretty closely
and with imap-2007a.DEV.SNAP-0802160141, I've noticed
some inconsistency with POP connections. Some clients
(Eudora on MAC and Thunderbird on windows for sure, probably others)
were not getting authenticated and couldn't receive new
Joel Reicher wrote:
You *can* have imapd run on the same server as the homedirs are. What
you can't (or shouldn't) do is leave open any kind of access to the
mailstore because there's no guarantee that a random app the user decides
to use won't corrupt the folders by accessing them as
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008, Gary Casterline wrote:
I've been following the DEV versions pretty closely
and with imap-2007a.DEV.SNAP-0802160141, I've noticed
some inconsistency with POP connections. Some clients
(Eudora on MAC and Thunderbird on windows for sure, probably others)
were not getting
Does this problem affect the released 2007 version as well? I have some
reports about pop problems but mainly from people using Google Gmail to
check pop from our servers.
Just curious if it might be related.
thanks,
David
Mark Crispin wrote:
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008, Gary Casterline wrote:
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008, Bob Atkins wrote:
As always - thank you for your continuing efforts to improve what is already
excellent imap server.
Thank you! [Today was not a good day...flat tire on my motorcycle on the
way to work...]
While we are having a group hug :-) I would like to thank the
Mark,
Mark Crispin wrote:
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008, Bob Atkins wrote:
As always - thank you for your continuing
efforts to improve what is already excellent imap server.
Thank you! [Today was not a good day...flat tire on my motorcycle on
the way to work...]
Bummer - I hope it
