f
to see if that would be parsed as a / but so far, it's always be literal
(foo%2f..%2fbar instead of foo/../bar).
So, opinions on what I'm missing???
Thanks,
Tom Leach
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Imap-uw mailing list
Imap-uw@u.washington.edu
https://mailman1.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-uw
the newer system hardware will offset the need for accelerators? We're
a medium sized installation with 300-500 simultaneous sessions.
Just curious what others are doing with crypto and imap.
Tom Leach
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Imap-uw maili
27;s back to sendmail.
Postfix was working in delivering mbox format to /var/mail, I'm just
trying to hammer it to work with d/tmail and deliver to a home directory
based mix inbox.
Thanks!
Tom Leach
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 04/10/2008 05:06 PM, Mark Crispin wrote:
First things first: dmail vs.
n.cf/master.cf tmail
lines and any other config pointers?
Thanks,
Tom Leach
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The setup: RHEL 5, postfix 2.3.3 (tried 2.5 as well), /var/mail symlink
to /var/spool/mail with perm 1777, imapd 2007a1 (not dev).
postfix main.cf:
mailbox_transport = tmail
tmail_destina
on direct tmail deliveries, but then I was
thinking that I may be driving up the load average due to exec'ing tmail
and locking the mix inbox on every incoming message vs appending to the
/var/mail mbox and then only needing to lock the mix inbox when the user
is actually requesting new mail.
