On Sat, 14 Mar 2009, Dag Nygren wrote:
Wrote a small program that sorts the .mixstatus file and
found that things work better. The noticed that the recreated .mixindex
also was out of order (on the UID:s) and ran the same sorting on that
file. Now everything works perfect.
The out of order .mix
lördag 14 mars 2009 01:33:44 skrev Dag Nygren:
> fredag 13 mars 2009 23:20:01 skrev Mark Crispin:
> > On Fri, 13 Mar 2009, Dag Nygren wrote:
> > >>> Now my question is: What does the last number mean?
> > >>
> > >> Refer to imap-/docs/mixfmt.txt
> > >
> > > Should .mixstatus be sorted by the
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009, Dag Nygren wrote:
Ok. Didn't see any warnings on them creating problems. Thought it was more
like fsck. Just rebuilding the metadata from the raw messages.
Good point. Thanks for bringing it up.
Yes, these repair tools are not like fsck. Their task is a single-minded
ef
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009, Dag Nygren wrote:
In other words: The status file is messed up by my rebuild of the mailbox
Comparing the erring .mixstatus with the newly created (by the "Mark all
read") shows that the last 8-digit hex code is the only difference (except
from an occasional flag of course)
On Thursday 12 March 2009, Dag Nygren wrote:
> Hi
>
> After running mixrbld my mix-format inbox always shows about half of the
> box is unread, both in kmail and accessed from my horde/imp webmail.
> Trying to mark the mails as read doesn't do anything.
> Have also tried using mixdfix. Doesn't chan
fredag 13 mars 2009 10:00:18 skrev Mark Crispin:
.
> The only reason to run mixrbld/mixdfix is if the mix driver reports errors
> and refuses to open the mailbox. You probably ran mixrbld/mixdfix
> unnecessarily, and that caused your problems.
Ok. Didn't see any warnings on them creating problem
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009, Dag Nygren wrote:
Why did you run mixrbld and mixdfix? These are very powerful tools that
should only be run in specific circumstances.
It is too long ago I did this for me to remember the exact reason. I think it
had something to do with kmail complaining about an attibute
fredag 13 mars 2009 04:18:58 skrev Mark Crispin:
> I am very confused reading this message.
>
> Why did you run mixrbld and mixdfix? These are very powerful tools that
> should only be run in specific circumstances.
>
> What were the exact text of any complaint messages which you received?
> Thos
fredag 13 mars 2009 04:18:58 skrev Mark Crispin:
> I am very confused reading this message.
>
> Why did you run mixrbld and mixdfix? These are very powerful tools that
> should only be run in specific circumstances.
It is too long ago I did this for me to remember the exact reason. I think it
h
I am very confused reading this message.
Why did you run mixrbld and mixdfix? These are very powerful tools that
should only be run in specific circumstances.
What were the exact text of any complaint messages which you received?
Those message are very specific. Paraphrasing them in a probl
Hi
After running mixrbld my mix-format inbox always shows about half of the box
is unread, both in kmail and accessed from my horde/imp webmail.
Trying to mark the mails as read doesn't do anything.
Have also tried using mixdfix. Doesn't change anything though.
Had complaints about mails being o
11 matches
Mail list logo
