[imp] advance upon "Mark as..."

2008-05-16 Thread Liam Hoekenga
A piece of feedback from one of our users since upgrading to IMP 4.2RC.. I just noticed that with the new upgrade, when you select 'Mark as UNSEEN' while reading email, it does not move to the next message to continue browsing. Instead, it remains on the same email. This prevents fluid

Re: [imp] mac os classic browsers that support horde 3.2 / imp 4.2

2008-05-16 Thread Michael Rubinsky
Quoting Liam Hoekenga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Can they not upgrade to Safari 2.x or 3.x? (Just asking, as I'm not a Mac user, but I do know Safari 1.x is _way_ behind the times, and won't work on _many_ web sites, not just horde/imp). Safari 2 requires at least MacOS 10.4.2. I have a user on

Re: [imp] mac os classic browsers that support horde 3.2 / imp 4.2

2008-05-16 Thread Liam Hoekenga
> Can they not upgrade to Safari 2.x or 3.x? (Just asking, as I'm > not a Mac user, but I do know Safari 1.x is _way_ behind the times, and > won't work on _many_ web sites, not just horde/imp). Safari 2 requires at least MacOS 10.4.2. >> I have a user on WinXP (no service packs); using IE6.0.

Re: [imp] mac os classic browsers that support horde 3.2 / imp 4.2

2008-05-16 Thread Liam Hoekenga
> Can they not upgrade to Safari 2.x or 3.x? (Just asking, as I'm > not a Mac user, but I do know Safari 1.x is _way_ behind the times, and > won't work on _many_ web sites, not just horde/imp). Safari 2 requires at least MacOS 10.4.2. >> I have a user on WinXP (no service packs); using IE6.0.

Re: [imp] mac os classic browsers that support horde 3.2 / imp 4.2

2008-05-16 Thread Eric Jon Rostetter
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > From our helpdesk... > >In Safari v1.x, the New Message button and the Delete links do not work. Can they not upgrade to Safari 2.x or 3.x? (Just asking, as I'm not a Mac user, but I do know Safari 1.x is _way_ behind the times, and won't work on _many_ web site

Re: [imp] cache lifetime decision?

2008-05-16 Thread Liam Hoekenga
>> With the new release, I see that many (most?) of the caches default to >> having a lifetime of 86400 seconds (24 hours). What's the reasoning / >> benefit to this? > > No real reason - 1 day/24 hours is just a nice round, easily > understood timeframe I guess. But.. if someone visits the page

Re: [imp] cache lifetime decision?

2008-05-16 Thread Michael M Slusarz
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > With the new release, I see that many (most?) of the caches default to > having a lifetime of 86400 seconds (24 hours). What's the reasoning / > benefit to this? No real reason - 1 day/24 hours is just a nice round, easily understood timeframe I guess. michael --

Re: [imp] Send attachments as links question

2008-05-16 Thread Jan Schneider
Zitat von Nicolás Valera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi, > > I see that the attachment size limits are applied no matter if the > attachments are sent with the message or as linked > attachments. > Now, when i send attachment as link, the attachment is stored on the > vfs defined in the horde conf.

Re: [imp] weird IMAP conversation w/ IMP 4.2RC3

2008-05-16 Thread Jan Schneider
Zitat von [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > >>> Specifically, the "STATUS INBOX|" that shows up frequently in our >>> protocol logs. >>> I've got 4.2RC4 on a test server, and haven't seen "STATUS INBOX|" in >>> any of the logs on that box since we upgraded. >>> >>> Any idea what was going on? What the change

Re: [imp] weird IMAP conversation w/ IMP 4.2RC3

2008-05-16 Thread liamr
>> Specifically, the "STATUS INBOX|" that shows up frequently in our >> protocol logs. >> I've got 4.2RC4 on a test server, and haven't seen "STATUS INBOX|" in >> any of the logs on that box since we upgraded. >> >> Any idea what was going on? What the change was? Can someone point >> me to a CV

Re: [imp] weird IMAP conversation w/ IMP 4.2RC3

2008-05-16 Thread Jan Schneider
Zitat von [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > We have witnesses a weird conversation between IMP and our IMAP > servers that our IMAP team suspects to be the cause of a huge outage > on Monday night.. > >> 1210861886>A0001 OK User logged in^M > <1210861886<0002 CAPABILITY^M >> 1210861886>* CAPABILITY IMAP4 I

Re: [imp] IMAP Toolkit Crash

2008-05-16 Thread Jan Schneider
Use Google! I found half a dozen entries in blogs, our bug tracker, our mailing archive which all explain how to solve it! Zitat von Seb Belcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I still haven't been able to find an answer to this problem elsewhere. > > The only further info I can suggest is that the cras

Re: [imp] mac os classic browsers that support horde 3.2 / imp 4.2

2008-05-16 Thread Jan Schneider
Zitat von [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > >> Most of this should be fixed if the users choose to not compose in a popup. > > Does turning off $_prefs['compose_popup'] do more that turning off > message composition in a popup then? No, but that was the problem, or not? Jan. -- Do you need professional PHP

[imp] Error: You have already submitted this page.

2008-05-16 Thread Volker Then
Hi, after updating to the latest FRAMEWORK_3 I'm getting this error when sending messages with imp: Error: You have already submitted this page. Bye Volker -- IMP mailing list - Join the hunt: http://horde.org/bounties/#imp Frequently Asked Questions: http://horde.org/faq/ To unsubscribe