On Tue, 6 Oct 2009, Wil Cooley wrote:
Andrew Morgan wrote:
We use rate-limiting here to control accounts that have been phished (a
fairly regular occurrence). I think our installation is very similar in
size to yours... We peak around 3k concurrent IMAP connections (most
from Webmail) and ha
Andrew Morgan wrote:
> We use rate-limiting here to control accounts that have been phished (a
> fairly regular occurrence). I think our installation is very similar in
> size to yours... We peak around 3k concurrent IMAP connections (most
> from Webmail) and have 3 webmail frontends. We are st
On Tue, 6 Oct 2009, Wil Cooley wrote:
We are considering implementing limits on recipients per message and per
time period using the features that we have now in IMP. We have a fairly
sizable user base; it's hard to estimate concurrent connnections with
HTTP being stateless and our IMAP connect
We are considering implementing limits on recipients per message and per
time period using the features that we have now in IMP. We have a fairly
sizable user base; it's hard to estimate concurrent connnections with
HTTP being stateless and our IMAP connections being cached with up-
imapproxyd,
