This makes absolutely no sense. The max_msgs preference is used only
in the IMP_Mailbox::buildMailboxPage() function, and that function is
never called from dimp. Changing that preference will cause no
difference in performance in dimp.
michael
Hmm. I changed it back to 200 and it is
Zitat von gimili [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This makes absolutely no sense. The max_msgs preference is used
only in the IMP_Mailbox::buildMailboxPage() function, and that
function is never called from dimp. Changing that preference will
cause no difference in performance in dimp.
michael
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Michael M Slusarz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Quoting gimili [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Why would dimp be *significantly* slower to generate message list than imp
on a large mailbox?
DIMP isn't slower per se - both DIMP and IMP use the exact same functions
Quoting gimili [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Why would dimp be *significantly* slower to generate message list
than imp on a large mailbox?
DIMP isn't slower per se - both DIMP and IMP use the exact same
functions to generate the message lists. However, DIMP processes a
larger chunk of messages
Why would dimp be *significantly* slower to generate message list than
imp on a large mailbox?
I also find if I delete a message it just puts a line through it whereas
this works perfectly in imp.
I am using newest stable versions.
Any help or advice much appreciated!
--
IMP mailing list
