Re: [imp] cache lifetime decision?

2008-05-20 Thread Michael M Slusarz
Quoting Liam Hoekenga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >>> With the new release, I see that many (most?) of the caches default to >>> having a lifetime of 86400 seconds (24 hours). What's the reasoning / >>> benefit to this? >> >> No real reason - 1 day/24 hours is just a nice round, easily >> understood t

Re: [imp] cache lifetime decision?

2008-05-16 Thread Liam Hoekenga
>> With the new release, I see that many (most?) of the caches default to >> having a lifetime of 86400 seconds (24 hours). What's the reasoning / >> benefit to this? > > No real reason - 1 day/24 hours is just a nice round, easily > understood timeframe I guess. But.. if someone visits the page

Re: [imp] cache lifetime decision?

2008-05-16 Thread Michael M Slusarz
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > With the new release, I see that many (most?) of the caches default to > having a lifetime of 86400 seconds (24 hours). What's the reasoning / > benefit to this? No real reason - 1 day/24 hours is just a nice round, easily understood timeframe I guess. michael --

[imp] cache lifetime decision?

2008-05-15 Thread liamr
With the new release, I see that many (most?) of the caches default to having a lifetime of 86400 seconds (24 hours). What's the reasoning / benefit to this? Liam -- IMP mailing list - Join the hunt: http://horde.org/bounties/#imp Frequently Asked Questions: http://horde.org/faq/ To unsu