Re: [imp] mail_domain pref (Re: way out of date ... add_maildomain_to_unexpandable)

2007-04-26 Thread Liam Hoekenga
Nope. Lee Nash wrote: > Liam, have you found a solution to this? > > Thanks, > -lee > > Quoting Liam Hoekenga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > >> I'm not totally crazy. I see that the mail_domain pref is somehow being >> used as part of a replacement for the old >> add_maildomain_to_unexpandable pref.

Re: [imp] mail_domain pref (Re: way out of date ... add_maildomain_to_unexpandable)

2007-04-25 Thread Lee Nash
Liam, have you found a solution to this? Thanks, -lee Quoting Liam Hoekenga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I'm not totally crazy. I see that the mail_domain pref is somehow being > used as part of a replacement for the old > add_maildomain_to_unexpandable pref. > > I've got mail_domain set.. yet, when

[imp] mail_domain pref (Re: way out of date ... add_maildomain_to_unexpandable)

2007-04-17 Thread Liam Hoekenga
I'm not totally crazy. I see that the mail_domain pref is somehow being used as part of a replacement for the old add_maildomain_to_unexpandable pref. I've got mail_domain set.. yet, when I try to send email to an unqualified address (that can't be expanded), I still get... There was an