), 914-396-6515 (mobile)
From:
Erik Bengtson
To:
imperius-dev@incubator.apache.org
Date:
03/17/2010 04:06 PM
Subject:
Re: Unnecessary class load in JavaActuator
David,
I assume that code used to support static methods invocations, so the
instance variable might be null on this scenario.
I pr
TJ Watson Research Center
> daw...@us.ibm.com
> 914-784-5123 (office), 914-396-6515 (mobile)
>
>
>
>
> From:
> Neeraj Joshi/Durham/i...@ibmus
> To:
> imperius-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Date:
> 03/17/2010 02:15 PM
> Subject:
> Re: Unnecessary class load in J
e:
03/17/2010 02:15 PM
Subject:
Re: Unnecessary class load in JavaActuator
Hey David,
I can't seem to recall any specific reason for the code below. Did you see
any issues using instance.getClass() ?
Thanks
Neeraj
~
Neeraj Joshi (knee-rudge)
We
e.org/imperius
~
From:
David Wood/Watson/i...@ibmus
To:
imperius-dev@incubator.apache.org
Date:
03/17/2010 12:41 PM
Subject:
Unnecessary class load in JavaActuator
Hi All,
I've got a situation in which my Java-bound policy imports an interface
Hi David,
It's a mystery to me as well. It's probably wrong, too.
But the corner case would be two classes with the same name from
different class loaders, and the subject code itself looks like it's
broken.
Craig
On Mar 17, 2010, at 9:41 AM, David Wood wrote:
Hi All,
I've got a situat
Hi All,
I've got a situation in which my Java-bound policy imports an interface,
but the implementation is provided by a class in a package I do not have
access to. This leads to problems in the JavaActuator.invokeMethod()
method which does the following:
c = Class.forName(instance.getClass(
