On 16 Sep 2011, Vegard Øye wrote:
> On 2011-09-16 22:19 +0200, Michael Markert wrote:
>
>> ,-
>> https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/elisp/html_node/Key-Binding-Conventions.html
>> | Don't bind C-h following any prefix character (including C-c).
>> | If you don't bind C-h, it is automatically avai
On 2011-09-16 22:19 +0200, Michael Markert wrote:
> ,-
> https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/elisp/html_node/Key-Binding-Conventions.html
> | Don't bind C-h following any prefix character (including C-c).
> | If you don't bind C-h, it is automatically available as a help
> | character for listing
Any updates here? I found the link I wanted to include:
,-
https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/elisp/html_node/Key-Binding-Conventions.html
| Don't bind C-h following any prefix character (including C-c). If you
| don't bind C-h, it is automatically available as a help character for
| listing the
On 8 Sep 2011, York Zhao wrote:
>> So C-w C-h would have shown what keys are accessible as C-w
>> something. I can't find anything in the docs right now, but test C-x
>> C-h (which is not bound, see C-h k C-x C-h) for example, and tell me
>> if it's useful[1] ;)
>
> I actually didn't understand e
>> Because prefixkey C-h describes the keymap I think it's far more
>> valuable to drop the vim compatibility here (esp. since C-w h does the
>> same).
>
> So C-w C-h would have shown what keys are accessible as C-w something. I
> can't find anything in the docs right now, but test C-x C-h (which i
On 8 Sep 2011, Vegard Øye wrote:
> On 2011-09-06 21:51 +0200, Michael Markert wrote:
>
>> Because prefixkey C-h describes the keymap I think it's far more
>> valuable to drop the vim compatibility here (esp. since C-w h
>> does the same).
>
> I don't understand. What's the harm in binding "C-w C-
On 2011-09-06 21:51 +0200, Michael Markert wrote:
> Because prefixkey C-h describes the keymap I think it's far more
> valuable to drop the vim compatibility here (esp. since C-w h
> does the same).
I don't understand. What's the harm in binding "C-w C-h" to a window
command?
--
Vegard
___
Hi,
currently C-h is mapped in `evil-window-map` (thus C-w C-h) while this
is great in terms of vim compatibility it's bad for Emacs integration.
Because prefixkey C-h describes the keymap I think it's far more
valuable to drop the vim compatibility here (esp. since C-w h does the
same).
What's
