Re: [Imports] TMC LCL - automatic script

Hi Frederik and Marcus, 2009/11/11 Frederik Ramm : > andrzej zaborowski wrote: >> Out of curiosity why are those relations type multiploygon instead of >> type boundary? > > type=boundary is discouraged as far as I am concerned. If anyone asks me I > always advise to use type=multigolyon (because

Re: [Imports] TMC LCL - automatic script

Hi, andrzej zaborowski wrote: > Out of curiosity why are those relations type multiploygon instead of > type boundary? type=boundary is discouraged as far as I am concerned. If anyone asks me I always advise to use type=multigolyon (because boundaries are essentialy multipolygons). The fact tha

Re: [Imports] TMC LCL - automatic script

On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 5:46 PM, andrzej zaborowski wrote: > Hi, > > 2009/11/10 Marcus Wolschon : >> >> >>   >>    > uid="2680" user="xylome" changeset="2807996"> >>       >>       >>       >>       >>       >>       >>       >>       >>       >>       >>       >>       >>       >>     > > Very

Re: [Imports] TMC LCL - automatic script

Hi, 2009/11/10 Marcus Wolschon : > > >   >     uid="2680" user="xylome" changeset="2807996"> >       >       >       >       >       >       >       >       >       >       >       >       >       >     Very cool results if this is automatic matching. Out of curiosity why are those relations t

Re: [Imports] TMC LCL - automatic script

2009/11/10 Sam Vekemans > > Isn't that the purpose of having the 'is_in' tag? > > For Canada, we have attached to each road the 'is_in tag, so it shows > exactly where it is. > > However, I would agree that if all the roads in that suburb area all have > that same tag, it's kind of redundent. >

Re: [Imports] TMC LCL - automatic script

On Mon, 9 Nov 2009 23:41:01 -0800, Sam Vekemans wrote: > On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 11:02 PM, wrote: > >> On Mon, 9 Nov 2009 21:43:17 -0800, Sam Vekemans >> wrote: >> > To understand, >> > is that bounding box/ polygon something that came from the source? >> > Or is it just the extents of the data?