Hi,
New comment inline below in this thread.
Sincerely,
Severin
Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 10:54:08 -0300
> From: S?verin MENARD
> To: Paul Norman
> Cc: imports@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [Imports] Import of UNICEF health facilities data for
> Central African Republic
On Tuesday 14 May 2013, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
> if source, date and revision are the same for all objects (or could
> be grouped into changesets with identical values), they could be
> tagged on the changeset only. Generally source-tags on objects are
> not a good idea (because it remains un
2013/5/14 Christoph Hormann
> ADD:code -> (discard)
> ADD:text -> note
> ADD:revision -> source:date
> ADD:date -> survey:date
> ADD:source=* -> source=ADD;*
>
if source, date and revision are the same for all objects (or could be
grouped into changesets with identical values), they could be ta
On Tuesday 14 May 2013, Paul Norman wrote:
>
> You are proposing ADD:code, ADD:date, ADD:text, ADD:source, and
> ADD:revision.
>
> The current wisdom is to not include these type of tags.
>
> The code duplicates the other OSM tags and is wrong as soon as
> someone reclassifies a feature.
>
> Date,
