2013/10/18 Christoph Hormann
> If you think this information is completely unreliable you can of course
> ignore it all together. But keep in mind the river/stream distinction
> is not an importance rating, therefore it is fully possible for a river
> to run into a stream.
>
this discussion be
On Wednesday 16 October 2013, Gnonthgol wrote:
> >
> > Then it would in my opinion make sense to tag all code 3 as
> > waterway=river and code 2 as river or stream depending on manual
> > assessment. No width tag.
>
> Having looked at the data this makes little sense, it is common to
> have a widt
