On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Jim Stob wrote:
> My question to the community is would you be interested in importing our
> POI data if it met or exceeded your quality expectations?
Jim,
First off, I'm sorry for the late response to your question.
As to your question, would we be interested
On 8/28/2015 10:26 AM, Eric Ladner wrote:
At least include the email from them directly instead of just a quote
from the email. I'm not an expert in licensing issues, tho. Others
may chime in.
Understand about the address points. Sometimes you have to just deal
with what you've got.
On F
At least include the email from them directly instead of just a quote from
the email. I'm not an expert in licensing issues, tho. Others may chime
in.
Understand about the address points. Sometimes you have to just deal with
what you've got.
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 8:37 AM Jonah Adkins wrote:
thanks, eric.
are you saying i need to get something more than the email i have
explicitly stating that i can import this data into OSM?
ill run & fix any validation errors during conflation/importing in JOSM.
the address points are a separate point layer, multiple points are not on
top of build
The data itself looks high quality with a lot of extra stuff to work with
(business names, amenity types are a nice bonus).
On to the picky stuff, though. :)
Licensing issues aside, having a contact name at York County GIS department
would be a plus. Having a more concrete statement from the GI
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Jim Stob wrote:
> Hello OSM Community,
>
> My name is Jim Stob and I am with Position Technologies, Inc. Position
> Tech works with large North America brands in managing their brick and
> mortar locations within the local ecosystem. We work closely with engines
>
