> Then you don't need a fixme, but a QA tool to list the parking spaces
> currently in OSM not yet having a access=private/public
> Noone will forget to remove the fixme if the correction is done because it is
> determined by the new added access tag.
> (See pieren's comment about osmose)
This i
Well these fixme are put because they need local survey.
I mean, for example, we know there is a parking space, but we did not have
enoght information to know if it is public or private.
So what will you suggest? The only options that came to my mind are:
+ Do not import these features.
+ Put a
Hi,
> Enrique, you might know that in France, we adopted a similar process
> to import cadastral buildings. But don't under-estimate one fact :
> some people will upload the data without correcting the issues, and
> they might do it massively in a short time (contributors we called the
> "black sh
> Well, as I pointed out previously[1], we kind of need to see to be able to
> comment on it. My understanding is that thanks to restrictions put on the
> original data, it can't be distributed, so all we're left with is a .osm
> file. Also, for a .osm creation program of cat2osm's complexity a .os
We are thankfull for your corrections but we want to make clear that
this is NOT an automated import tool, it is a HELP tool to improve the
information. These fixme are put in order to OBLIGATE the local mapper
that is ussing the tool to correct the mistakes BEFORE upload.
WE INSIST, THIS IS NOT A
2013/2/28 Paul Norman :
>> From: Cruz Enrique Borges [mailto:cruz.bor...@deusto.es]
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 11:36 PM
> The concerns being expressed are about using multiple ways to represent one
> building. How big do you estimate the import will be total, both in number
> of building
> But in this case would not natural=water be better suited?
After carefully reading the map features page I agree with you. We will review
all the water related tag.
> Well, it's not possible to review them without also looking at the cadastre
> data. For example, how could I verify that what
Fist of all, thanks for the comments. I will answers them in place.
> There appear to be some ways with duplicated way nodes (i.e. a way having
> the same node multiple times, other than when closing a loop). JOSM's
> validator can find these.
This have already been addressed.
> There are some
Thanks for the comments. I will answer below:
> - not taking in account building levels
>
>
> I think this information is quite interesting (for making 3D Models),
> in other regions people are investing a lot of work to survey these
> (and to split the buildings accordingly). Strange you decided
