Re: [Imports] [Talk-ca] The great UUID debate (Was Re: 092G area)

2009-10-14 Thread Richard Weait
Sam removed that context, then spun this new thread and widened distribution! Here's some context, Sam thinks uuids are uninteresting and not useful in imported data. Michael, below, thinks uuids are useful. Now the rest of the conversation in context. On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 12:06 AM, Michael

Re: [Imports] [Talk-ca] The great UUID debate (Was Re: 092G area)

2009-10-14 Thread Kate Chapman
I also think UUID is important in the case of imported data. It will ease the update of datasets that we bring in. Kate Chapman On Oct 14, 2009, at 7:48 AM, Richard Weait wrote: > Sam removed that context, then spun this new thread and widened > distribution! Here's some context, Sam thinks

Re: [Imports] [Talk-ca] The great UUID debate (Was Re: 092G area)

2009-10-14 Thread Andy Allan
Will it? I keep hearing that but don't really believe it. It would be hard enough merging changes if the data was not converted, has a 1:1 correspondence in geometries and hadn't been editing in the meantime. But given that people will split ways, make multipolygons, and a certain %age of uuids wil

Re: [Imports] [Talk-ca] The great UUID debate (Was Re: 092G area)

2009-10-14 Thread Michael Barabanov
While this can indeed happen in many cases, Canada is so huge that I expect large areas to be left as is, and not have this problem. Even for densely populated areas like Vancouver, the rate of changes isn't all that high right now. Michael. On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 05:03:27PM +0100, Andy Allan

Re: [Imports] [Talk-ca] The great UUID debate (Was Re: 092G area)

2009-10-14 Thread Kate Chapman
Andy, I suspect it will not help with every single geometry, but I think there will be plenty of untouched ones though. Unfortunately I do not have a specific example of a situation where this has worked, but it seems better than the alternative of not using any UUIDs. For example importing all o

Re: [Imports] [Talk-ca] The great UUID debate (Was Re: 092G area)

2009-10-14 Thread andrzej zaborowski
2009/10/14 Andy Allan : > Will it? I keep hearing that but don't really believe it. It would be > hard enough merging changes if the data was not converted, has a 1:1 > correspondence in geometries and hadn't been editing in the meantime. > But given that people will split ways, make multipolygons,

Re: [Imports] [Talk-ca] The great UUID debate (Was Re: 092G area)

2009-10-14 Thread Michael Barabanov
If you read the thread a bit more, you'll see that I'm exactly for including UUIDs during import:) My message you've replied to was trying to address the concern of UUIDs being mangled during subsequent editing. Michael. On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 02:22:16PM -0400, Kevin Farrugia (kevinfarru...@g

Re: [Imports] [Talk-ca] The great UUID debate (Was Re: 092G area)

2009-10-14 Thread Sam Vekemans
Thanks everyone for the comments. :) I have updated the readme.txt file, and it will be available as included in each of the .zip files which contain the source SHP files and the converted .osm files, as well as the various rules.txt files, compressed as a .zip, as well as the changelog.txt file.