Re: [Imports] [Talk-us] [US] NHD04090004

2010-03-17 Thread Ian Dees
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Nakor wrote: >   Hello, > > I was importing NHD data in my area and found some issues in the data I > downloaded: The Rouge River in Detroit area > () is visible on the > NHD map (see attached screenshot) but is

Re: [Imports] [Talk-us] [US] NHD04090004

2010-03-17 Thread Mike N.
One thing I see is that this river shows at the edge of the NHD export boundary. I have seen cases where an NHD feature does not appear in the NHD export sub-basin that one would expect, but in the adjoining NHD sub-basin export. Some times the same feature - usually a river - appears in m

Re: [Imports] [Talk-us] [US] NHD04090004

2010-03-18 Thread Nakor
> > Did you also upload the NHDArea and NHDWaterbody data? Since the river > is pretty wide, the NHDArea data will designate the boundary of the > river rather than specify it only with a Flowline. The Flowline data > will include an "artificial" flowline for the river centerline (which > it doesn'

Re: [Imports] [Talk-us] [US] NHD04090004

2010-03-18 Thread Nakor
On 03/17/2010 11:38 AM, Mike N. wrote: > One thing I see is that this river shows at the edge of the NHD export > boundary. I have seen cases where an NHD feature does not appear in the > NHD export sub-basin that one would expect, but in the adjoining NHD > sub-basin export. Some times the sam

Re: [Imports] [Talk-us] [US] NHD04090004

2010-05-02 Thread Nakor
On 3/20/2010 9:01 AM, James Umbanhowar wrote: I would recommend checking the original shapefile to double check that it is in the data. The river is indeed in the shapefile so that is the script I used, http://svn.openstreetmap.org/applications/utils/import/nhd2osm/ as advised on http: