[Imports] Import of Lakes from water.usgs.gov

Instead of importing lots of data, I have imported only one lake for your review and approval. I have documented it here : http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/h4ck3rm1k3/diary/8927 Water files, Bull Shoals Lake, Norfork lake I have been looking for the shape files for the Bull Shoals Lake, and Nor

Re: [Imports] Import of Lakes from water.usgs.gov

Thanks to Emilie Laffray, I now have two lake relations : http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/3356201 http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/361097 and norfork: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/3356156 http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/361094 Thanks for yo

Re: [Imports] Import of Lakes from water.usgs.gov

On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 8:19 AM, jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com < jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Instead of importing lots of data, I have imported only one lake for > your review and approval. > > I have documented it here : > http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/h4ck3rm1k3/diary/8927 > >

Re: [Imports] Import of Lakes from water.usgs.gov

On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Ian Dees wrote: > On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 8:19 AM, jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com > wrote: >> >> Instead of importing lots of data, I have imported only one lake for >> your review and approval. >> >> I have documented it here : >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/use

Re: [Imports] Import of Lakes from water.usgs.gov

On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 4:22 PM, jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote: > On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Ian Dees wrote: >> The current NHD either includes these updates or is higher quality than this >> historical stuff that the USGS has. I would recommend working on importing >> the NHD rathe

Re: [Imports] Import of Lakes from water.usgs.gov

On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Ian Dees wrote: > > The current NHD either includes these updates or is higher quality than this > historical stuff that the USGS has. I would recommend working on importing > the NHD rather than other datasets. > > Also, lakes should not have a natural=coastline

Re: [Imports] Import of Lakes from water.usgs.gov

On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 5:15 PM, Kate wrote: > On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Ian Dees wrote: >> >> The current NHD either includes these updates or is higher quality than this >> historical stuff that the USGS has. I would recommend working on importing >> the NHD rather than other datasets.

Re: [Imports] Import of Lakes from water.usgs.gov

On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 9:29 AM, jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com < jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 4:22 PM, jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com > wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Ian Dees wrote: > > >> The current NHD either includes these updates or is high

Re: [Imports] Import of Lakes from water.usgs.gov

On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 11:19 AM, jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote: > I agree completely. What I did with my splitter script is to create > one file per Item. Large lakes and things can be processed that way, I > just sorted the resulting files and loaded the biggest one into josm. > A splitti