Hello OSM Community,
My name is Jim Stob and I am with Position Technologies, Inc. Position Tech
works with large North America brands in managing their brick and mortar
locations within the local ecosystem. We work closely with engines like Google
and Bing as well as licensing our data to App
Sounds great to me, POI data is hard to crowd source. Assuming the
licensing and existing data issues are taken care of, I vote yes.
Elliott Plack
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 11:59 AM Jim Stob wrote:
> Hello OSM Community,
>
>
> My name is Jim Stob and I am with Position Technologies, Inc. Position
Same as Elliot for me
On Aug 27, 2015 4:49 PM, "Elliott Plack" wrote:
> Sounds great to me, POI data is hard to crowd source. Assuming the
> licensing and existing data issues are taken care of, I vote yes.
>
> Elliott Plack
>
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 11:59 AM Jim Stob wrote:
>
>> Hello OSM Com
On 8/27/2015 11:56 AM, Jim Stob wrote:
Hello OSM Community,
My name is Jim Stob and I am with Position Technologies, Inc. Position Tech
works with large North America brands in managing their brick and mortar
locations within the local ecosystem. We work closely with engines like Google
and
sent from a phone
> Am 27.08.2015 um 17:56 schrieb Jim Stob :
>
> My question to the community is would you be interested in importing our POI
> data if it met or exceeded your quality expectations?
If the license issues can be solved and the data is up to date, this sounds
very promising
From the responses received it sounds like we should first look at the
licensing issue. I’d prefer not to make our TM and Data Agreement public but
would be happy to send it to OSM's legal or those familiar the OSM license. If
our agreement does not provide the necessary language I’d be happy to
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Jim Stob wrote:
> Hello OSM Community,
>
> My name is Jim Stob and I am with Position Technologies, Inc. Position
> Tech works with large North America brands in managing their brick and
> mortar locations within the local ecosystem. We work closely with engines
>
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Jim Stob wrote:
> My question to the community is would you be interested in importing our
> POI data if it met or exceeded your quality expectations?
Jim,
First off, I'm sorry for the late response to your question.
As to your question, would we be interested
Hi Jim,
Am 2015-08-28 um 05:52 schrieb Jim Stob:
> From the responses received it sounds like we should first look at the
> licensing issue. I’d prefer not to make our TM and Data Agreement public but
> would be happy to send it to OSM's legal or those familiar the OSM license.
The OpenStreetM
On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 12:18 AM, Michael Reichert wrote:
> The OpenStreetMap community is an open community and that's why we
> strees openess and transparency. That's why sending the "TM and Data
> Agreement" has to be published.
>
Michael,
I don't understand why OSM cares in anyway about trad
Note that tools exist to help with ongoing conflation/synchronization.
Overwriting data entered by hand is a general OSM third rail topic.
However, a script that creates a list of "things to check" or "mismatches"
has a welcome home: for example it can become a "maproulette" job, where a
human come
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Jim Stob wrote:
>
> My question to the community is would you be interested in importing our
> POI data if it met or exceeded your quality expectations?
>
I'm OK with this on the caveat that the locations are accurate to a
reasonable degree (such as on the custom
12 matches
Mail list logo
