> From: Pieren [mailto:pier...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 2:11 AM
> To: imports
> Subject: Re: [Imports] addressmerge 0.1 release
>
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 12:08 AM, Paul Norman wrote:
> > I would suggest adding addr:city but not addr:country.
> :
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 12:08 AM, Paul Norman wrote:
> I would suggest adding addr:city but not addr:country.
:
> Although theoretically addr:city can be inferred from the admin_level
> boundaries it is still useful to have. You will run into situations where
> the same address + street occurs in
l you everything you need to know about the
usage. Is there something that's not clear?
From: Clifford Snow [mailto:cliff...@snowandsnow.us]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 2:18 PM
To: Paul Norman
Cc: imports
Subject: Re: [Imports] addressmerge 0.1 release
Paul,
Thanks for the addressmer
Paul,
Thanks for the addressmerge. I have a question on running it. As you said
the instructions were minimal. Can you give me a little more help with
actual process. I do have imposm installed, but confused about what form
the point file should be in and what the output file should be.
Also, look
Paul -
Thanks for this - we'll take a look at it / test it with the Seattle Import
data & report back with lessons learned!
Thanks, Jeff
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 1:36 AM, Paul Norman wrote:
> For the last couple of weeks I've been working on addressmerge, a tool to
> post-process address data by
For the last couple of weeks I've been working on addressmerge, a tool to
post-process address data by comparing it with existing OSM data. I have
pushed release 0.1 to https://github.com/pnorman/addressmerge
Currently it will take a file in importable .osm format, compare it with
existing OSM dat
