http://picasaweb.google.com/WLiauh/RunningIndy2InSXDE4UnderVirtualBox
Screenshot 01: Splash screen after Indy2 LiveCD is inserted into SXDE4 CD drive
Screenshot 02: Indy2 LiveCD begins to run in SXDE4 under VirtualBox
Screenshot 03: First screen of Indy2 LiveCD running in SXDE4, selecting
keybo
On Feb 13, 2008 9:37 AM, John Tracy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello All-
> I recently installed Developer Preview 2, and was pleasantly surprised when a
> bash shell greeted me by default. I was wondering, however, if we may change
> the default prompt to be something a bit more useful than ju
On Feb 13, 2008 3:12 PM, Brian Cameron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Brian
>
> Joerg is referring to the fact that ksh93 and bourne shell have some
> minor incompatibilities. It is possible to write a script that will
> work differently in the two shells. Academics have even written some
> scrip
[ Bcc'ing advocacy-discuss and opensolaris-discuss to reduce cross-posting ]
Peter,
> It would help a lot if the aims of this project were clearly explained
> and enunciated, because I for one haven't a clue what they are, and
> the more I think about it and look at what has been announced and
>
On Feb 13, 2008, at 3:14 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> $ mkdir ae-tmp
> $ mv ae-2.6.0a.tar.gz ae-tmp
> $ hdiutil makehybrid -o ae-tmp ae-tmp/
>
> and then tell VirtualBox to export that ISO file, ae-tmp.iso, into the
> VM.
Or get VBox to mount it as a CD. -T
_
Peter Tribble wrote:
> On Feb 13, 2008 8:44 PM, Dave Miner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Sigh. We have made no statements about compatibility with anything,
>> either past or future, in the preview releases. It's an experiment.
>> The negativity some of you have towards experiments just amazes me
> That's good, thank you. Now the problem is how to get it from the net
> without network access. :-) I'll try to figure it out (I understand that
> there is no "shared folders drivers" for Solaris).
The way I got the "ae" tarball into the VM was to create an ISO under
MacOS X
$ mkdir ae-
On Feb 13, 2008 8:44 PM, Dave Miner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Sigh. We have made no statements about compatibility with anything,
> either past or future, in the preview releases. It's an experiment.
> The negativity some of you have towards experiments just amazes me
> sometimes.
But what'
The GNOME l10n packages are available from pkg.opensolaris.org:
pkg:/[EMAIL PROTECTED],5.11-0.75:20071114T205021Z
Laca
On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 08:18 -0700, Sanjay Nadkarni wrote:
> Alex wrote:
> > What about national locales (russian) in this preview?
> >
> No localization is available for previ
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> installed the beast on VirtualBox on OS X (two betas in one shot) and I'm
>> without any network interface... Docs claims the virtual interface is an
>
> My recommendation for now with VirtualBox is to download Masayuki
> Murayama's "ae" driver
>
>
Hi John,
In the meantime, I think this /etc/profile hack might be nice to include
in the Getting Started Guide (could be a nice start to a new section on
shells). Instructions for accessing the source for the guide and
contributing are here if you're interested:
http://opensolaris.org/os/proje
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 03:12:31PM -0600, Brian Cameron wrote:
> Joerg is referring to the fact that ksh93 and bourne shell have some
> minor incompatibilities. It is possible to write a script that will
> work differently in the two shells. Academics have even written some
> scripts to demonstr
Brian
Joerg is referring to the fact that ksh93 and bourne shell have some
minor incompatibilities. It is possible to write a script that will
work differently in the two shells. Academics have even written some
scripts to demonstrate these incompatibilities really exist.
The three users in th
Hi Julian,
Good idea but unfortunately the bios does not have an option for
disabling the built-in network interface and the installation does not
get far enough to give me a shell to type commands.
On 13 Feb 2008, at 20:51, Julian Wiesener wrote:
> try to disable the Network-Interface. I've
Hello David,
On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 20:23 +, David Blundell wrote:
> If anyone has any ideas for avoiding the timeouts, I'd love to hear
> them.
try to disable the Network-Interface. I've seen such errors on my
Laptop, ata i/o become frozen as soon as i plumb a network interface,
the install
Joerg Schilling wrote:
> "Shawn Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Feb 13, 2008 11:10 AM, Joerg Schilling
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Glynn Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
o ksh93 is the default *system* shell (bash remains the default
user shell)
>>> What do
I am trying to install Indiana Preview 2 onto a spare desktop PC. The
desktop is a Shuttle SS51G with this motherboard:
http://eu.shuttle.com/archive/en/fs51.htm#mainboardfs5
Something very similar to this hardware is listed in the HCL at
http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/hcl/data/systems/details/1
I still think it's a wee misleading, one assumes that he/she already has the 75
version.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-d
yes, but it can be confusing - you are upgrading to b79 but should install the
b75 SUNWipkg - I simply thought the procedure was prepared for b75 upgrades...
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss@o
The image update went OK.
But seems there is some message problem for pkg command:
-bash-3.2# [b]pkg status -u
pkg: no packages installed [/b]
doesn't sound right...
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
indiana-discuss mailing li
On Feb 13, 2008 1:02 PM, Lurie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I second that, please add a comment, it's a common pitfall.
There is actually a comment on the upgrading page about that already.
It notes the important of specifying the version of the package when
installing it.
--
Shawn Walker, Soft
On Feb 13, 2008, at 1:10 PM, Rich Teer wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Shawn Walker wrote:
>
>> /usr/has/bin/sh
>>
>> ...since it is a "hasbin" :)
>
> Groan!
korny
___
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.or
On Feb 13, 2008 1:21 PM, Glynn Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > Brian Nitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Joerg Schilling wrote:
> >>> Glynn Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> o ksh93 is the default *system* shell (bash remains the de
Hey,
Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Brian Nitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Joerg Schilling wrote:
>>> Glynn Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
o ksh93 is the default *system* shell (bash remains the default
user shell)
>>> What do you understand by "*system* sh
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Shawn Walker wrote:
> /usr/has/bin/sh
>
> ...since it is a "hasbin" :)
Groan!
--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA, OGB member
CEO,
My Online Home Inventory
URLs: http://www.rite-group.com/rich
http://www.linkedin.com/in/richteer
http://www.myonlinehomeinventory.
Brian Nitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > Glynn Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>o ksh93 is the default *system* shell (bash remains the default
> >> user shell)
> >>
> >
> > What do you understand by "*system* shell"?
> >
> > Jörg
> >
> >
"Shawn Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 13, 2008 11:10 AM, Joerg Schilling
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Glynn Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >o ksh93 is the default *system* shell (bash remains the default
> > > user shell)
> >
> > What do you understand by "*sys
Joerg Schilling wrote:
> BTW: I vote against allowing to replace /sbin/sh by something different than
> a
> 100% compatible Bourne shell for distributions that like to use the
> OpenSolaris
> trademark.
Discussions of what properties distros must have to use the OpenSolaris
trademark are bein
I second that, please add a comment, it's a common pitfall.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
OK I thought that was for previous release and was trying to be a smart ass :-)
Maybe the step can be a little specific and say use the SUNWipkg that matches
the CURRENT NV version ( 0.75 fro build 75 )
Let's see how the image update goes
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_
On Feb 13, 2008 11:10 AM, Joerg Schilling
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Glynn Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >o ksh93 is the default *system* shell (bash remains the default
> > user shell)
>
> What do you understand by "*system* shell"?
/sbin/sh, /usr/bin/sh are now really ksh93.
> I don't know if there are separate packages to download because I just
> installed the beast on VirtualBox on OS X (two betas in one shot) and I'm
> without any network interface... Docs claims the virtual interface is an
> AMD PCNet. But the ernel don't detect anything. Any hints on this one?
M
Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Glynn Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>o ksh93 is the default *system* shell (bash remains the default
>> user shell)
>>
>
> What do you understand by "*system* shell"?
>
> Jörg
>
>
It's the shell /usr/sh points to. This satisfies backward compat
Glynn Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>o ksh93 is the default *system* shell (bash remains the default
> user shell)
What do you understand by "*system* shell"?
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED](uni)
* Sean Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-13 17:04]:
> That's actually exactly what I did last time and this time. As you can see my
> clones are already mounted.
> # zfs list
> NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT
> zpl_slim 6.06G 6.37G71K /zpl_slim
> zpl_slim/ex
That's actually exactly what I did last time and this time. As you can see my
clones are already mounted.
# zfs list
NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT
zpl_slim 6.06G 6.37G71K /zpl_slim
zpl_slim/export 3.58G 6.37G19K /export
zpl_slim/export/home 3
Sean Liu wrote:
> Was trying to find out if indy2 can be upgraded via image refresh. but when I
> was installing the new SUNWipkg, I get:
> # pkg install SUNWipkg
Follow the instructions here:
http://opensolaris.org/os/project/indiana/resources/update_guidelines/
This will be much easier (more
Giacomo Tufano wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Sanjay Nadkarni wrote:
>> Alex wrote:
>>> What about national locales (russian) in this preview?
>>>
>> No localization is available for preview-2. We are planning on having
>> this available for the next release.
>
> Some support for ISO-xxx or UTF-8 l
Was trying to find out if indy2 can be upgraded via image refresh. but when I
was installing the new SUNWipkg, I get:
# pkg install SUNWipkg
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 607, in ?
ret = main_func()
File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 572, in main_func
install(img,
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Sanjay Nadkarni wrote:
> Alex wrote:
>> What about national locales (russian) in this preview?
>>
> No localization is available for preview-2. We are planning on having
> this available for the next release.
Some support for ISO-xxx or UTF-8 locales? Default locale is 'C' and
Hello All-
I recently installed Developer Preview 2, and was pleasantly surprised when a
bash shell greeted me by default. I was wondering, however, if we may change
the default prompt to be something a bit more useful than just "bash3.2$". One
of the first things I do when deploying a copy of S
Alex wrote:
> What about national locales (russian) in this preview?
>
No localization is available for preview-2. We are planning on having
this available for the next release.
-Sanjay
> --
>
> This message posted from opensolaris.org
>
> ___
> ind
On Feb 13, 2008 2:54 AM, Glynn Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>o ksh93 is the default *system* shell
It has been a long, long way since CR 655171. Thank you for the change.
Chris
--
^---^
(@)v(@) Chris Pickett
|/ IT consultant
===m==m=== [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
Hello,
Ok..it is now Bug 525.
I tested the previous 'test release' of Preview 2 and Evolution failed to fully
initialize as well.
- Ken
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss@opensolaris.org
http:
What about national locales (russian) in this preview?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
Hi Glynn,
thanks for the good work.
can you give a short comment on the differences to the Preview2 test release ?
Just wondering what will happen if I will use LiveUpdate :)
@Tobias:
Tack så mycket :)
cheers
baba
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_
Thanks! Keep up the good work :)
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
Thanks for the new release.
We at DF - the Computer Society at Lund University and
Lund Institute of Technology, have updated our mirror,
the new release is available at:
ftp://ftp.df.lth.se/pub/indiana/current/
The mirror is located in Lund, South Sweden.
//Tobias Lundquist
Glynn Foster wr
48 matches
Mail list logo
