One thing that surprised me was the size of the update. I expected less
because of the space-saving attributes of pkg I thought I read about on a blog
at one point. And given the size of the install CD, I expected the download to
be compressed more than is.
> The command "pkg image-update"
I
The pkg.opensolaris.org repository has been updated to the snv_90 level.
This update also includes snv_89 packages.
PAY ATTENTION TO THE ATTACHED UPDATE PROCEDURE!!! Failure to do so will
prevent your system from rebooting.
Please see the attached for instructions for updating from OpenSolari
Great news Tim.
I think this falls at 7AM here in Sydney, I look forward to listening in.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-
Hi Tim,
Thanks, I appreciate you getting the community involved in some of
the planning re: Indiana. Just for my own clarification as to what
sorts of requirements you're gathering, I assume you're asking the OGB
members to participate purely as interested OpenSolaris community
members (i.
All (apologies in advance for cross-posting),
I'd like to have a requirements gathering session with all of you and OGB,
first to go through some of the progress and shortcomings of the current
OpenSolaris 2008.05 release, and then to start gathering requirements to help
me prioritize the Sun
> IMHO, a
> package shouldn't list a recommended supplemental
> package as a
> dependency.
You and Peter have a very valid point here. I was just being too lazy.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-di
> Not releasing
> specs for hardware will backlash, you just watch.
> Not providing binary option for a big player
> like Sun at least is a bad thing to do. Such
> acts these days will certainly drive your company
> down into the ground with minimal
> time.
Actually, I couldn't have agreed with
W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
>>> my modus operandi is to install everything java
>>>
>> using a single command (thanks a whole bunch to Sun's
>> Java team!):
>>
>>> pfexec pkg install java-dev
>>>
>> That's stunningly badly named. I would expect that to
>> install
>> the jdk+docs+demos,
Any time soon is 2012, or when the next version has been out for
somewhere around 9 months. Microsoft will not EOL products out of the
blue, they are better about providing support than most vendors. They
often extend EOLs as well. Retail will continue for sub-pc oems until
Jan of 2009, w
>> We didn't even have those builds internally until we
>> recently had build
>> 89 available and then build 90 is close on its heels.
>> We hope to push
>> he latter out in the next day or so to
>> http://pkg.opensolaris.org
>
> No one wants to prattle on about this, but I have to ask, is there a
* Alan Coopersmith ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Rick Murphy wrote:
> > Thanks much in advance for your time. I would like to upgrade my SDXE 79b
> > to the new 2008.05 Live CD.
>
> There is no upgrade option in 2008.05 at this time, you'ld have
> to backup your data & configuration, then do a fr
> We didn't even have those builds internally until we
> recently had build
> 89 available and then build 90 is close on its heels.
> We hope to push
> he latter out in the next day or so to
> http://pkg.opensolaris.org
No one wants to prattle on about this, but I have to ask, is there a new ETA?
Rick Murphy wrote:
> Thanks much in advance for your time. I would like to upgrade my SDXE 79b to
> the new 2008.05 Live CD.
There is no upgrade option in 2008.05 at this time, you'ld have
to backup your data & configuration, then do a fresh install.
--
-Alan Coopersmith- [EM
> > Now this is potentially where Java could help. You
> will have different operating systems, but all of
> them will interact with the users using the same Java
> VM. At the expected rate of 10 to 20 million new
> users a year, it will take no time to reach the 100
> million mark. Guess Sun di
On 6 Jun 2008, at 01:02, Nick wrote:
> I have not yet created a bug report for the issue however i will get
> to it later tonight, when i do i will post the bug ID in this thread
> so we can keep track.
>
> Any other suggestions are appreciated.
'truss /usr/bin/packagemanager' will give you
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 4:11 AM, W. Wayne Liauh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Indeed this is one area of rapid growth!
>> > Interesting enough is Ubuntu
>> > s offering a version called Remix,
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> tp://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=v
>>
>> > iewArticleBasic&article
Title: E-mail Signature Sun 2006
We could have the full open source version available on the package
repository.
Gilles.
Che Kristo wrote:
It wouldn't amaze me...
If I'm not mistaken the guest additions were under a proprietary license
when owned by Innotek.
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 12:49 +
17 matches
Mail list logo
