Hi guys, one of Italian user group friend need to update his opensolaris
installation (running snv_107) to an older release, like snv_109 because
the latest has some bugs for him.
Any hints to do this taks?
--
Luca Morettoni | OpenSolaris SCA #OS0344
Web/BLOG: http://www.morettoni.net/ | http:/
I'm not sure I follow your question, but I think it is this:
You are currently running snv_107 and wish to update.
The latest available is snv_111, but you cannot update to it (due to
known bugs).
So, you want to update to a release which is not the current latest, but
snv_109.
I don't belie
Or rolling back for that matter..
Brian Ruthven - Sun UK wrote:
I'm not sure I follow your question, but I think it is this:
You are currently running snv_107 and wish to update.
The latest available is snv_111, but you cannot update to it (due to
known bugs).
So, you want to update to a rele
Not sure I understand the question - but it means
upgrade the named BE to snv_109 (assuming that the
BE was at a lower revision - I've not actually
tried it the other way around).
Yiannis Mavroukakis wrote:
Would this install your existing packages from 109?
Peter Dennis - Sustaining Engineer
Would this install your existing packages from 109?
Peter Dennis - Sustaining Engineer wrote:
What I have done in the past is something like:
beadm create snv_109
beadm mount snv_109 /mnt
pkg -R /mnt install ent...@0.5.11,5.11-0.109
which appeared to work for me.
Brian Ruthven -
What I have done in the past is something like:
beadm create snv_109
beadm mount snv_109 /mnt
pkg -R /mnt install ent...@0.5.11,5.11-0.109
which appeared to work for me.
Brian Ruthven - Sun UK wrote:
I'm not sure I follow your question, but I think it is this:
You a
Sorry Peter I'll explain. Say I am at svn_110, will doing
pkg -R /mnt install ent...@0.5.11,5.11-0.109 a) downgrade my 110 BE to
109? If so
will it downgrade the existing packages I have installed to 109 or
install the default packages
for 109?
Thanks!
Peter Dennis - Sustaining Engineer wrote
Yiannis Mavroukakis wrote:
Sorry Peter I'll explain. Say I am at svn_110, will doing
pkg -R /mnt install ent...@0.5.11,5.11-0.109 a) downgrade my 110 BE to
109? If so
will it downgrade the existing packages I have installed to 109 or
install the default packages
for 109?
Ah ha :-) And I'v
trying it now..
Peter Dennis - Sustaining Engineer wrote:
Yiannis Mavroukakis wrote:
Sorry Peter I'll explain. Say I am at svn_110, will doing
pkg -R /mnt install ent...@0.5.11,5.11-0.109 a) downgrade my 110 BE
to 109? If so
will it downgrade the existing packages I have installed to 109 or
Blargh no joy.
pfexec pkg -R /mnt install ent...@0.5.11,5.11-0.109
No updates available for this image.
Y.
Peter Dennis - Sustaining Engineer wrote:
Yiannis Mavroukakis wrote:
Sorry Peter I'll explain. Say I am at svn_110, will doing
pkg -R /mnt install ent...@0.5.11,5.11-0.109 a) downg
Thanks!
This method works perfectly!
$ pfexec beadm create snv_109
$ pfexec beadm mount snv_109 /mnt
$ pfexec pkg -R /mnt install ent...@0.5.11,5.11-0.109
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-disc
Thanks!
This method works perfectly!
$ pfexec beadm create snv_109
$ pfexec beadm mount snv_109 /mnt
$ pfexec pkg -R /mnt install ent...@0.5.11,5.11-0.109
You mean, you were doing this on snv_110, and managed to create BE with snv_109?
Cool!
Wonder, if this work both at Nevada & Indi
A couple of weeks have passed and I've now attempted to update from b108 to
b110 with the same effect. I've done a bit more checking and it is very similar
to a problem recently reported by a person trying to update from b106 to b108.
It appears to be that the system is hanging when the Xorg ser
Peter, do you still have an issue you need resolved?
-Original Message-
From: Peter Dennis - Sustaining Engineer (peter.den...@sun.com)
Sent: Apr 2, 2009 6:44:24 AM
Subject: Re: [indiana-discuss] upgrading to an older release
Not sure I understand the question - but it means
upgrade the
* Mykola Maslov (mmas...@aval.ua) wrote:
>> Thanks!
>> This method works perfectly!
>>
>>
>> $ pfexec beadm create snv_109
>> $ pfexec beadm mount snv_109 /mnt
>> $ pfexec pkg -R /mnt install ent...@0.5.11,5.11-0.109
>
> You mean, you were doing this on snv_110, and managed to create BE wit
Marco Falchi wrote:
Thanks!
This method works perfectly!
$ pfexec beadm create snv_109
$ pfexec beadm mount snv_109 /mnt
$ pfexec pkg -R /mnt install ent...@0.5.11,5.11-0.109
I assume your current environment when executing this was
lower than 109; pkg doesn't allow backwards moves...
> Marco Falchi wrote:
> > Thanks!
> > This method works perfectly!
> >
> >
> > $ pfexec beadm create snv_109
> > $ pfexec beadm mount snv_109 /mnt
> > $ pfexec pkg -R /mnt install
> ent...@0.5.11,5.11-0.109
>
> I assume your current environment when executing this
> was
> lower than 109;
I got the Firefox problem fixed by deleting the various cache files in my
.mozilla directory; the fact that Firefox went wonky must have just been by
pure coincidence.
Thanks for letting me know about the Nevada fix.
-- William Kucharski
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
Marco Falchi wrote:
Thanks!
This method works perfectly!
$ pfexec beadm create snv_109
$ pfexec beadm mount snv_109 /mnt
$ pfexec pkg -R /mnt install
ent...@0.5.11,5.11-0.109
I assume your current environment when executing this
was
lower than 109; p
> > Easy to get around--just "beadm destroy" it. :-)
> But may be advisable to zpool send a snapshot before
> destroying it.
>
> not sure what you mean, or how beadm destroy comes
> into play. pkg
> oesn't allow you to take a BE from 109 to 108 (for
> example).
This is what I meant (abs
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 6:14 AM, W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
> This is what I meant (abstractly speaking): zpool send 109@ => beadm destroy
> 109 => pfexec pkg -R /mnt install ent...@0.5.11,5.11-0.108 => (optionally)
> zpool recv 109@
You mean something similar to debootstrap or "yum install
--install
21 matches
Mail list logo
