Re: [indiana-discuss] snv_111b

2009-05-30 Thread Aubrey Li
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 8:10 AM, dick hoogendijk wrote: > On Sat, 30 May 2009 15:03:48 PDT > Lurie wrote: > >> > Question abouy the snv_111b released today in >> > opensolaris/dev: is this the long awaited 2009.06 >> > release or one more respin before the final release? >> >> Given that the offi

Re: [indiana-discuss] Update fails from snv111a to current (111b?)

2009-05-30 Thread Shawn Walker
Seymour Krebs wrote: As suggested, I tried to unstall Open-office to get around this. this also failed until I manually backed up and then destroyed the offending directory structures in /opt/openoffice. see below For the record, I assume you are on x86 and *not* SPARC? Did you happen to c

Re: [indiana-discuss] zfs-auto-snap

2009-05-30 Thread dick hoogendijk
On Sat, 30 May 2009 23:39:17 +0200 Kees Nuyt wrote: > On Sat, 30 May 2009 22:30:15 +0200, dick hoogendijk wrote: > >All I can customize is *what* to snap ;-) > >Can I set the time intervals somewhere too? > > Analyse > /var/svc/manifest/system/filesystem/auto-snapshot.xml Will do. It's not the

Re: [indiana-discuss] snv_111b

2009-05-30 Thread dick hoogendijk
On Sat, 30 May 2009 15:03:48 PDT Lurie wrote: > > Question abouy the snv_111b released today in > > opensolaris/dev: is this the long awaited 2009.06 > > release or one more respin before the final release? > > Given that the official release is on Monday, I'm quite sure that > this is the 2009.

Re: [indiana-discuss] snv_111b

2009-05-30 Thread Oscar del Rio
nice! $ cat /etc/release OpenSolaris 2009.06 snv_111b X86 Copyright 2009 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Use is subject to license terms. Assembled 07 May 2009 $ cat /etc/motd Sun Microsystems

Re: [indiana-discuss] Update fails from snv111a to current (111b?)

2009-05-30 Thread Seymour Krebs
As suggested, I tried to unstall Open-office to get around this. this also failed until I manually backed up and then destroyed the offending directory structures in /opt/openoffice. see below :~# pkg -R /mnt image-update DOWNLOADPKGS FILES XFER (M

Re: [indiana-discuss] Update fails from snv111a to current (111b?)

2009-05-30 Thread Shawn Walker
Seymour Krebs wrote: I get a similar message if using the GUI update manager. The error message implies that pfexec is needed however this same result is obtained under "su" or "pfexec". Have I been wrong all these years thinking that superuser was the ultimate authority in the UNIX world? (

[indiana-discuss] Update fails from snv111a to current (111b?)

2009-05-30 Thread Seymour Krebs
I get a similar message if using the GUI update manager. The error message implies that pfexec is needed however this same result is obtained under "su" or "pfexec". Have I been wrong all these years thinking that superuser was the ultimate authority in the UNIX world? (jk) :~$ pfexec pkg -R

Re: [indiana-discuss] snv_111b

2009-05-30 Thread Lurie
> Question abouy the snv_111b released today in > opensolaris/dev: is this the long awaited 2009.06 > release or one more respin before the final release? Given that the official release is on Monday, I'm quite sure that this is the 2009.06 release... -- This message posted from opensolaris.org

Re: [indiana-discuss] snv_111b

2009-05-30 Thread Dave Miner
dick hoogendijk wrote: Question abouy the snv_111b released today in opensolaris/dev: is this the long awaited 2009.06 release or one more respin before the final release? Looking at pkg.opensolaris.org/release should provide the answer... Dave ___

Re: [indiana-discuss] zfs-auto-snap

2009-05-30 Thread Kees Nuyt
On Sat, 30 May 2009 22:30:15 +0200, dick hoogendijk wrote: >On Sat, 30 May 2009 13:40:58 -0400 >Oscar del Rio wrote: > >> dick hoogendijk wrote: >> > I just did a "zfs list -t snapshot" and saw a whole bunch of >> > zfs-auto-snaps". Didn't know they were created. Don't want that >> > either I thi

Re: [indiana-discuss] zfs-auto-snap

2009-05-30 Thread dick hoogendijk
On Sat, 30 May 2009 13:40:58 -0400 Oscar del Rio wrote: > dick hoogendijk wrote: > > I just did a "zfs list -t snapshot" and saw a whole bunch of > > zfs-auto-snaps". Didn't know they were created. Don't want that > > either I think. I'm a manual man ;-) How can I turn this off? > > zfs autosnap

[indiana-discuss] snv_111b

2009-05-30 Thread dick hoogendijk
Question abouy the snv_111b released today in opensolaris/dev: is this the long awaited 2009.06 release or one more respin before the final release? -- Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D + http://nagual.nl/ | nevada / OpenSolaris 2009.06 B111a + All that's really worth doing is what we do

Re: [indiana-discuss] Update manager failure

2009-05-30 Thread David . Comay
Action upgrade failed for 'kernel/misc/md5' (pkg:/SUNWckr): ActionExecutionError: [errno 2: No such file or directory]: missing hard link target 'kernel/crypto/md5' The running system has not been modified. Modifications were only made to a clone of the running system. This clone is mounted at

Re: [indiana-discuss] zfs-auto-snap

2009-05-30 Thread Oscar del Rio
dick hoogendijk wrote: I just did a "zfs list -t snapshot" and saw a whole bunch of zfs-auto-snaps". Didn't know they were created. Don't want that either I think. I'm a manual man ;-) How can I turn this off? zfs autosnaps/time-slider can be a life saver (or file saver at least). A great feat

Re: [indiana-discuss] Update manager failure

2009-05-30 Thread Ché Kristo
I have just experienced this also on 111a I have upgraded SUNWipkg, SUNWipkg-gui & SUNWipkg-um as you suggested and re-run image-update I get: Action upgrade failed for 'kernel/misc/md5' (pkg:/SUNWckr): ActionExecutionError: [errno 2: No such file or directory]: missing hard link target 'kern

Re: [indiana-discuss] Update manager failure

2009-05-30 Thread David Abrahams
on Fri May 29 2009, David.Comay-AT-Sun.COM wrote: >> I was surprised to see that there seemed to be updates available for my >> 0906 installation. Anyway, I tried to do the update, but to no avail: >> >> Preparing... >> Ensuring Update Manager is up to date... >> Gathering packages information,