and my preso at C1
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/advocacy/files/09_C1_Speaker_Masafumi_ohta_LT_u7.pdf
-masafumi
Masafumi Ohta さんは書きました:
Hi guys
I just made OpenSolaris for Eee PC distro:
http://kohju.justplayer.com/docs/mirror/OpenSolaris/eeepc-special/osol-0906-111a-x86-for-EeePCs.
Glynn Foster さんは書きました:
On 17/06/2009, at 12:48 PM, Che Kristo wrote:
Great idea, maybe a project (under the desktop community) focused on the
effort would be a good idea? Particluarly with the ARM port...i'm
sure the
netbook will be a viable platform in the future
I'd certainly like to see
Hi guys
I just made OpenSolaris for Eee PC distro:
http://kohju.justplayer.com/docs/mirror/OpenSolaris/eeepc-special/osol-0906-111a-x86-for-EeePCs.usb
(it should be better to use make its LiveUSB imade though the LiveUSB
for creater for windows by Chonan:
http://genunix.org/dist/windows/liveusb
On 17/06/2009, at 12:48 PM, Che Kristo wrote:
Great idea, maybe a project (under the desktop community) focused on
the
effort would be a good idea? Particluarly with the ARM port...i'm
sure the
netbook will be a viable platform in the future
I'd certainly like to see someone have a try at
Great idea, maybe a project (under the desktop community) focused on the
effort would be a good idea? Particluarly with the ARM port...i'm sure the
netbook will be a viable platform in the future
2009/6/17 Jonathan Edwards
> Just started playing around with Ubuntu Netbook Remix and was wondering
On Jun 16, 2009, at 4:24 PM, Bart Smaalders wrote:
Robert Milkowski wrote:
So for example if I want to uninstall a package A I won't end-up
with another 20 packages being installed automatically. I know one
can check dependencies in advance but still...
How would this happen? We don't supp
Robert Milkowski wrote:
So for example if I want to uninstall a package A I won't end-up with
another 20 packages being installed automatically. I know one can check
dependencies in advance but still...
How would this happen? We don't support require dependencies that
offer a choice; thus u
UNIX admin wrote:
The problem is, the server(s) onto which software is installed might
already be running. In production. You cannot possibly expect that a
cluster of servers running SWIFT transactions between Europe and the
U.S., or any other financial software or mission critical software,
mus
solarg wrote:
hello all,
i'm testing a soft that needs ld.so.1:
he...@ultra20:~$ ./sage-3.4.2-i86pc-SunOS+toolchain/sage -gdb
: no (or bad) /usr/lib/ld.so.1
: no (or bad) /usr/lib/ld.so.1
What does pkg search -l /usr/lib/ld.so.1 report.
On my system:
: ba...@cyber[73]; pkg search -l /usr/lib/
Today I've been asked about the license of the script. I'm releasing it to the
public domain. It is available for anyone to use for any purpose.
Andrzej
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss@openso
Just started playing around with Ubuntu Netbook Remix and was
wondering if we were planning a netbook optimized opensolaris distro?
I do like what they're doing with the screen real-estate as i find
that i typically have to move the docks out of the way, and try to
tweak some of the fonts t
hello all,
i'm testing a soft that needs ld.so.1:
he...@ultra20:~$ ./sage-3.4.2-i86pc-SunOS+toolchain/sage -gdb
: no (or bad) /usr/lib/ld.so.1
: no (or bad) /usr/lib/ld.so.1
so fixing the pkg shows strange messages:
he...@ultra20:~$ pfexec pkg fix SUNWcs
Verifying: pkg:/SUNWcs
> If the packaging system is so inflexible that
> administrators are unable to
> define or implement the policies they need to, they
> have several options,
> including (a) being miserable, (b) violating the
> packaging system by going
> behind its back, (c) using a different packaging
> system. I'
> If you want Oracle to run every time the machine
> boots, you should
> deliver an SMF manifest that sets up such a service.
> Mark it enabled
> s default, and set
> reset-fmri=svc:/system/manifest-import on the
> xml file that delivers the manifest. You're done.
Hmmm, since Larry owns you now,
> How do I install such a package in an alternate root?
-R is currently not doable. Believe me, I've been thinking about how to solve
that problem, since I'd like to have my existing System V Oracle packages be
installable via a JumpStart profile.
Need I write more?
One possible solution woul
> Arrg - and that should be more secure than using a
> postinstall script???
>
>
> Sorry, but using an SMF Service for configuring an
> application makes
> developing of packages more complicated and will lead
> to lot of new
> errors
I agree -- while somwhat simple for system administra
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, Peter Tribble wrote:
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 1:24 AM, Bart Smaalders wrote:
Because the job of the packaging system is to manage software
on the machine according to the constraints imposed on that software
by its developer, and by the administrator.
Yet you're denying
17 matches
Mail list logo
