Hello all,
Can we please EOL the use of "*indiana*" soon, archive all the mailing
list entries and website pages, and formally replace it (and
rename/reallocate the project) with(in) "OpenSolaris"? Mike Kupfer
recently pointed out the fact the opening sentence on the indiana docs
page ( http:
Which is where the (somewhat ill thought out) differentiation between the
"opensolaris product" and "opensolaris community" becomes a problem.
Personally I believe that the "opensolaris product" should just be named as
"Solaris Enterprise" for the current Solaris, "Solaris Standard" for the
indiana
Hello list, in my laptop I have this BE:
$ beadm list
BE Active Mountpoint Space Policy Created
-- -- -- - -- ---
os-121 - - 117.64M static 2009-08-29 16:29
os-122 - - 126.35M static 2009-09-04 13:06
os-123 - - 180.52M
does anyone know when we get a osol-1002-XXX-sparc.iso release?
osol-1002-124-ai-sparc.iso is there -- which is good and very much (!)
appreciated -- but a osol-1002-XXX-sparc.iso would ease install and setup a lot
on sparc.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
__
Luca Morettoni wrote:
Hello list, in my laptop I have this BE:
$ beadm list
BE Active Mountpoint Space Policy Created
-- -- -- - -- ---
os-121 - - 117.64M static 2009-08-29 16:29
os-122 - - 126.35M static 2009-09-04 13:06
os-123 -
124 closed for pushes on Sep 14. 127 is the current build. I don't
think the sausage comes out of the machine much faster.
Niki W. Waibel wrote:
does anyone know when we get a osol-1002-XXX-sparc.iso release?
osol-1002-124-ai-sparc.iso is there -- which is good and very much (!)
appreciated
Niki:
Currently we only had AI for sparc only, if you are looking for a
bootable iso for sparc, then you have to wait until bootable AI project
integrate in a later build of osol 1002.
Spec for bootable AI:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/caiman/Bootable_AI_Image/
Dan Mick wrote:
124
Joseph J VLcek wrote:
Luca Morettoni wrote:
Hello list, in my laptop I have this BE:
$ beadm list
BE Active Mountpoint Space Policy Created
-- -- -- - -- ---
os-121 - - 117.64M static 2009-08-29 16:29
os-122 - - 126.35M static 2009
Ah. I missed that fine distinction, sorry.
mary ding wrote:
Niki:
Currently we only had AI for sparc only, if you are looking for a
bootable iso for sparc, then you have to wait until bootable AI project
integrate in a later build of osol 1002.
Spec for bootable AI:
http://www.opensolaris
i do not fully understand why a bootable AI shall come first.
what is the reason why there is no osol-1002-XXX-sparc.iso so far?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.ope
Niki W. Waibel wrote:
> i do not fully understand why a bootable AI shall come first.
>
> what is the reason why there is no osol-1002-XXX-sparc.iso so far?
Because the text mode installer isn't done yet, and most SPARC
systems supported by opensolaris wouldn't be able to use the
graphical instal
> > what is the reason why there is no osol-1002-XXX-sparc.iso so far?
>
> Because the text mode installer isn't done yet, and most SPARC
> systems supported by opensolaris wouldn't be able to use the
> graphical installer.
hmm -- is this of no priority for osol-1002 (final)? as there will be no
Niki W. Waibel wrote:
what is the reason why there is no osol-1002-XXX-sparc.iso so far?
Because the text mode installer isn't done yet, and most SPARC
systems supported by opensolaris wouldn't be able to use the
graphical installer.
hmm -- is this of no priority for osol-1002 (fin
Hi,
See uts/common/fs/devfs/*.c. Look at the function dv_shadow_node() in
devfs_subr.c and its callers.
Please note, the mini-/devices is not a public interface so please do
*not* expose it to users
and/or rely on it being stable. It may change radically or go away in a
future release.
Vikra
[CC'd pkg-discuss]
Garrett D'Amore wrote:
So I have a driver that for an audio part that more or less falls
"outside" of the set of core audio drivers that we want to support. It
works, but its probably not useful to the vast, vast majority of our users.
Still, I'd like to make this driver a
Liane Praza wrote:
> Something like that, anyways. I don't know what format contrib wants
> its packages in, so I can't speak to what you'd need to do there.
JDS/RPM-style spec files, from which source juicer builds binary packages.
--
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@sun.c
Shawn Walker wrote:
[CC'd pkg-discuss]
Garrett D'Amore wrote:
So I have a driver that for an audio part that more or less falls
"outside" of the set of core audio drivers that we want to support.
It works, but its probably not useful to the vast, vast majority of
our users.
Still, I'd like
17 matches
Mail list logo
