Re: [indiana-discuss] [ogb-discuss] [osol-discuss] This is how Oracle treats open communities and projects. Will OGB intervene?

2010-05-11 Thread Martin Bochnig
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote: > John Sonnenschein wrote: >> You are forging emails for your own political gains and I'm going to have to >> ask you to stop slandering me and my work *immediately*. It is completely >> unacceptable behaviour. > > Given Mr. Johnson's prev

Re: [indiana-discuss] [ogb-discuss] [osol-discuss] This is how Oracle treats open communities and projects. Will OGB intervene?

2010-05-11 Thread Alan Coopersmith
John Sonnenschein wrote: > You are forging emails for your own political gains and I'm going to have to > ask you to stop slandering me and my work *immediately*. It is completely > unacceptable behaviour. Given Mr. Johnson's previous posts about Opera dropping support to avoid huge Oracle fees

Re: [indiana-discuss] [ogb-discuss] [osol-discuss] This is how Oracle treats open communities and projects. Will OGB intervene?

2010-05-11 Thread John Sonnenschein
On 2010-05-10, at 6:15 AM, Dave Johnson wrote: >> >> Where's your "evidence", troll? > > Here is the evidence: > > Evidence 1: > - Project cooperation with ksh project withdrawn > - GNU commands as replacements are the future > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: John Sonnenschei

Re: [indiana-discuss] [ogb-discuss] [osol-discuss] This is how Oracle treats open communities and projects. Will OGB intervene?

2010-05-10 Thread John Plocher
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 6:15 AM, Dave Johnson wrote: > This is how Oracle treats open communities and projects. Will OGB intervene? While I have not been following this soap opera in excruciating detail, my reading of the ARC discussions was that the ksh-93 project to replace existing GNU utiliti

Re: [indiana-discuss] [ogb-discuss] [osol-discuss] This is how Oracle treats open communities and projects. Will OGB intervene?

2010-05-10 Thread Chris Pickett
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote: > >>On 05-10-10, John Plocher wrote: >>On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 6:15 AM, Dave Johnson >> wrote: >>> This is how Oracle treats open communities and projects. Will OGB intervene? > >> While I have not been following this soap opera in excruciatin

Re: [indiana-discuss] [ogb-discuss] [osol-discuss] This is how Oracle treats open communities and projects. Will OGB intervene?

2010-05-10 Thread Martin Bochnig
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote: > >>On 05-10-10, John Plocher wrote: >>On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 6:15 AM, Dave Johnson >> wrote: >>> This is how Oracle treats open communities and projects. Will OGB intervene? > >> While I have not been following this soap opera in excruciatin

Re: [indiana-discuss] [ogb-discuss] [osol-discuss] This is how Oracle treats open communities and projects. Will OGB intervene?

2010-05-10 Thread Dennis Clarke
>On 05-10-10, John Plocher wrote:  >On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 6:15 AM, Dave Johnson > wrote: >> This is how Oracle treats open communities and projects. Will OGB intervene? > While I have not been following this soap opera in excruciating > detail John, I looked at it as "some guy" making a fair

Re: [indiana-discuss] [ogb-discuss] [osol-discuss] This is how Oracle treats open communities and projects. Will OGB intervene?

2010-05-10 Thread Martin Bochnig
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 4:33 PM, John Plocher wrote: > On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 6:15 AM, Dave Johnson > wrote: >> This is how Oracle treats open communities and projects. Will OGB intervene? > > While I have not been following this soap opera in excruciating > detail, my reading of the ARC discuss