s
> to all people (if it does, it ends up failing everybody).
>
> Cheers-
> John
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Nitz
> Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 9:05 AM
> To: Richard Elling
> Cc
ensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [indiana-discuss] About SXCE, SXDE, Indiana future
Richard Elling wrote:
> Andrew Watkins wrote:
>
>> I wonder is this the starting point of Sun having 2 supported
Operating systems, a server version (Solaris) and a desktop version
(Indiana/OpenSolaris). I find it
Hopefully, Ian (I'm not really on a first name basis with him;) )
Will model the release cycle as he did in Debian.
1) stable
2) testing
3) experimental
Users of Solaris would be able to glom onto whichever release they're
comfortable with.
"Big Iron" servers, for instance, would be able to use
Richard Elling wrote:
> Andrew Watkins wrote:
>
>> I wonder is this the starting point of Sun having 2 supported Operating
>> systems, a server version (Solaris) and a desktop version
>> (Indiana/OpenSolaris). I find it very hard to believe that they would be
>> able to convince big business
Andrew Watkins wrote:
> I wonder is this the starting point of Sun having 2 supported Operating
> systems, a server version (Solaris) and a desktop version
> (Indiana/OpenSolaris). I find it very hard to believe that they would be able
> to convince big business that the new Indiana would run th
I wonder is this the starting point of Sun having 2 supported Operating
systems, a server version (Solaris) and a desktop version
(Indiana/OpenSolaris). I find it very hard to believe that they would be able
to convince big business that the new Indiana would run there big systems.
More in lin
> Girts Zeltins wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I want to know future of SXCE, SXDE, Indiana. Is
> there plans to discontinue SXCE or SXDE? Which will
> dominant for community, which will release in builds?
> > Any information about future of SXCE and SXDE?
>
> I asked the director at Sun in charge
Hello,
I think that there must be only Indiana which must be in place of SXCE and must
release in Builds.
No need SXDE with integrated development tools.
Regards,
Girts
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
indiana-discuss mailing list
indi
Girts Zeltins wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I want to know future of SXCE, SXDE, Indiana. Is there plans to discontinue
> SXCE or SXDE? Which will dominant for community, which will release in builds?
> Any information about future of SXCE and SXDE?
I asked the director at Sun in charge of SXDE about
See http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=43774&tstart=0
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
Hello all,
I want to know future of SXCE, SXDE, Indiana. Is there plans to discontinue
SXCE or SXDE? Which will dominant for community, which will release in builds?
Any information about future of SXCE and SXDE?
Regards,
Girts
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_
11 matches
Mail list logo
