> > I notice from
> http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=4887#
> c6 that this bug
> > has been fixed in Nevada build 105. Is it possible
> to apply this fix to 2008.11
> > without recompiling any binaries? If so - what is
> the fix?
>
> James Cornell suggested doing the setuid on the
Andrew:
I notice from http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=4887#c6 that this bug
has been fixed in Nevada build 105. Is it possible to apply this fix to 2008.11
without recompiling any binaries? If so - what is the fix?
James Cornell suggested doing the setuid on the gdm binary.
> andrew wrote:
> > I notice from
> http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=4887#
> c6 that this bug has been fixed in Nevada build 105.
> Is it possible to apply this fix to 2008.11 without
> recompiling any binaries? If so - what is the fix?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Andrew.
> >
> Wasn't
andrew wrote:
> I notice from http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=4887#c6 that
> this bug has been fixed in Nevada build 105. Is it possible to apply this fix
> to 2008.11 without recompiling any binaries? If so - what is the fix?
>
> Thanks
>
> Andrew.
>
Wasn't this a setuid bit
I notice from http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=4887#c6 that
this bug has been fixed in Nevada build 105. Is it possible to apply this fix
to 2008.11 without recompiling any binaries? If so - what is the fix?
Thanks
Andrew.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
