Steve Scargall wrote:
###
### I'll leave the b107 in it's current 'broken' state in case anyone needs
more information from me
### The next step would be to delete the b107 boot environment and try the image-update
again but using the "-v" flag to see if we get any new information
###
The -v
###
### Like others here I also just completed a "pfexec pkg install
sunwi...@0.5.11-0.107; pfexec pkg refresh; pfexec pkg image-update" and now get
the following after a reboot:
###
ld.so.1: svc.configd: fatal: relocation error: file /lib/libsecdb.so.1:
symbol defopen_r: referenced sym
Thanks for the workaround listed in
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=3562
That worked wonderfully.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org
Shawn Walker wrote:
Lurie wrote:
Just updated myself without any problems, the only thing I noticed
that is not working so far is the packagemanager
Due to a dependency that is missing from the package definition, you
will need to:
pfexec pkg install SUNWgnome-python-extras
...to get it wo
Lurie wrote:
You can manually download the three libc_hwcap1(2,3).so.1:
...
Note that those files are gzip compressed.
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
___
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinf
More on this:
http://pkg.opensolaris.org/dev/en/search.shtml?token=libc_hwcap%2A&action=Search
Doesn't give a result for b107 ?
Yet,
http://pkg.opensolaris.org/dev/manifest/0/SUNWcsl%400.5.11%2C5.11-0.107%3A20090212T172317Z
clearly has libc_hwcap
You can manually download the three libc_hwcap1(2
Mario Goebbels wrote:
Maybe
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=3562
?
libc definitely didn't update. Had to delete it and pkg fix the image root.
Can you add your notes to that bug?
Thanks,
--
Shawn Walker
___
indiana-discuss mailing
> Maybe
> http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=3562
> ?
libc definitely didn't update. Had to delete it and pkg fix the image root.
Thanks,
-mg
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss@ope
> Maybe
> http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=3562
> ?
Hmmm, I'll be running image-update again and check libc. Thanks for the hint.
-mg
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss@opensolar
Strange, it works fine for me:
$ nm /.zfs/snapshot/2008.11/lib/libc.so | grep defopen_r
$
$ nm /lib/libc.so | grep defopen_r
00047479 T defopen_r
Maybe http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=3562 ?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
I'm getting a similar error, tried this both via updatemanager and image-update
(not that they should behave any differently). The error I'm getting:
ld.so.1: svc.configd: fatal: relocation error: file /lib/libsecdb.so.1: symbol
defopen_r: referenced symbol not found
As the previous poster note
> Due to a dependency that is missing from the package
> definition, you
> will need to:
>
> pfexec pkg install SUNWgnome-python-extras
>
> ...to get it working again.
Yep, that fixed it, thanks.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
indian
Lurie wrote:
Just updated myself without any problems, the only thing I noticed that is not
working so far is the packagemanager
Due to a dependency that is missing from the package definition, you
will need to:
pfexec pkg install SUNWgnome-python-extras
...to get it working again.
Cheers
Just updated myself without any problems, the only thing I noticed that is not
working so far is the packagemanager
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/
I've done an image-update to build 107. Trying to boot it, SMF seems to be
failing hard due to a relocation error. It appears that the symbol "refopen_r"
in libsecdb.so.1 is missing. Checking the repository, there isn't a build 107
of the related package (SUNWcsl). Is the repo update not complet
15 matches
Mail list logo
