Sounds very good to me :)
On 18 Apr 2008, at 03:01, John Meyer wrote:
Barbara --
I'm new to the group, but I'm an old Sun hand and would like to
suggest the following:
"The OpenSolaris OS will install only onto ZFS, not UFS. The single
ZFS pool installed
will initially consist of the en
Yes, Let me try to rewrite without the term support.
Barbara
Michal Bielicki wrote:
> If I read the conversation correctly, the word support is wrong here.
> It seems the install can be done on ZFS only but of course UFS and
> ther file systems are supported on a running system.
>
> Michal
>
>
Nevada installation appears only to support UFS on one disk, based on my recent
experience installing that OS. Frankly, I've been struggling to overcome that,
and I've only been able to get as far as breaking my Nevada installation
attempting to build a mirrored disk pair (my Ultra-60 is limite
Barbara --
I'm new to the group, but I'm an old Sun hand and would like to
suggest the following:
"The OpenSolaris OS will install only onto ZFS, not UFS. The single
ZFS pool installed
will initially consist of the entire Solaris fdisk partition of the
disk identified
at installation. T
If I read the conversation correctly, the word support is wrong here.
It seems the install can be done on ZFS only but of course UFS and
ther file systems are supported on a running system.
Michal
On 16 Apr 2008, at 21:54, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> All,
> I can rewrite the existing sentence
All,
I can rewrite the existing sentence in the "Limitations for the
OpenSolaris 2008.05 release" section of the Getting Started:
Existing text:
"The OpenSolaris OS has ZFS support only. The installation of the
OpenSolaris OS supports
only one pool on one disk."
Revised text:
"The OpenSolaris
> The limitation applies only to the pool created by
> the installer.
> Perhaps some re-wording is in order on that page, but
> ZFS is in no way
> crippled in Indiana. Nor are UFS and other file
> systems missing, which
> one might infer from the first sentence of the
> quote...
This makes MUC
Richard Bruce wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was browsing the Indiana documentation
> (http://dlc.sun.com/osol/docs/content/IPS/limits.html), and came across the
> last limitation.
>
> "The OpenSolaris OS has ZFS support only. The installation of the OpenSolaris
> OS supports only one pool on one disk."
Richard Bruce wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was browsing the Indiana documentation
> (http://dlc.sun.com/osol/docs/content/IPS/limits.html), and came
> across the last limitation.
>
> "The OpenSolaris OS has ZFS support only. The installation of the
> OpenSolaris OS supports only one pool on one disk."
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 9:57 AM, Richard Bruce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was browsing the Indiana documentation
> (http://dlc.sun.com/osol/docs/content/IPS/limits.html), and came across the
> last limitation.
>
> "The OpenSolaris OS has ZFS support only. The installation of the
Hi all,
I was browsing the Indiana documentation
(http://dlc.sun.com/osol/docs/content/IPS/limits.html), and came across the
last limitation.
"The OpenSolaris OS has ZFS support only. The installation of the OpenSolaris
OS supports only one pool on one disk."
Is this correct? If so, this see
11 matches
Mail list logo
