Don't know if you have seen this http://www.cuddletech.com/blog/ but looks like
teddies are being thrown out of prams!
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.o
>
> On 5 Jul 2010, at 16:58, Paul Johnston wrote:
>
> > Just wondering if anyone from Oracle is able to
> comment on the roadmap that inspired this thread
>
> No more than they've been able to already.
>
> > or can we assume OpenSolaris has been put to bed?
>
> You can if you want to, but unle
On 5 Jul 2010, at 16:58, Paul Johnston wrote:
> Just wondering if anyone from Oracle is able to comment on the roadmap that
> inspired this thread
No more than they've been able to already.
> or can we assume OpenSolaris has been put to bed?
You can if you want to, but unless Oracle have anno
Just wondering if anyone from Oracle is able to comment on the roadmap that
inspired this thread or can we assume OpenSolaris has been put to bed?
I just searched the Oracle site and not seen anything!
Regards Paul
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
__
After a brief brainstorm with my collegues, I can safely say that also in Italy
2010.2H came. One of them also postulated that it came to Italy before than in
CA, but I just can't elaborate more on this.
And Osol is missing with no info about it and at least one bug that makes if of
no use for a
Sigh..
it's now already 2010.2H in California, USA.
why can't /release just a branch out /dev and keep /dev going forward? duh...
Ivan.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss@opensolaris.org
http:/
Ok, enough for now.
I'll install a BSD flavour in the week-end. Waiting for too long, now.
See you, OpenSolaris...
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org
> > > > Just some late breaking news:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/06/21/oracle_opensol
>
> >
> > > aris_solaris_plans/
> > >
> > > no that's old..I should know ;)
> > >
> > > patience, please
> >
> >
> >
> > I assume OpenSolaris's next update is still
> > schedule
> > > Just some late breaking news:
> > >
> >
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/06/21/oracle_opensol
>
> > aris_solaris_plans/
> >
> > no that's old..I should know ;)
> >
> > patience, please
>
>
>
> I assume OpenSolaris's next update is still
> scheduled for
> 1st half CY2010.
yeah, wi
> > Just some late breaking news:
> >
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/06/21/oracle_opensol
> aris_solaris_plans/
>
> no that's old..I should know ;)
>
> patience, please
I assume OpenSolaris's next update is still scheduled for
1st half CY2010.
OpenSolaris
– Next update 1st half CY20
Good things will come for those who are patient and understanding.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
> Just some late breaking news:
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/06/21/oracle_opensolaris_solaris_plans/
no that's old..I should know ;)
patience, please
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss@o
I agree, it would be nice if Oracle changed the way they communicate.
I think they should eventually, if they want to maintain the support
from the opensolaris community.
I hope they understand that products without a community are worth a lot
less..
Just some late breaking news:
http://ww
> The Open Solaris project needs a lot of soul
> searching--personally I think it has become
> hopelessly stagnant, disappointingly going nowhere,
> and was wasting a lot of my time
It's such a shame that this isn't a community project, but rather a following.
For something that was supposed to b
For those of us who have to worry about making pay rolls, the No. 1 item that's
always in our mind is that we have enough cash in the bank to make the pay roll.
For Oracle/Ellison, I believe their No. 1 priority right now is to make sure
that the Sun acquisition shows a sign of, or at least lead
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 15:04, Alex Lam S.L. wrote:
> I don't want to start anything nasty either, but from prior experience
> around this topic, "it is ready when it is ready" would seem to be the
> best answer to this question.
>
> I am not even sure now which build they are going to base the ne
I don't want to start anything nasty either, but from prior experience
around this topic, "it is ready when it is ready" would seem to be the
best answer to this question.
I am not even sure now which build they are going to base the next
official release upon. Would certainly not be impressed if
Ok, this is not to start a flame war, just to hope for news/hints/grapevine, is
there any hope to get 2010.06?
At first I can understand 2010.03 is delayed to accommodate showstopper fixes,
but with quite a few builds after b134 as of now, is it really a point to have
something like b134a? wha
18 matches
Mail list logo
