The OpenSolaris development package repository
http://pkg.opensolaris.org/
has been updated to reflect the changes in snv_92 and snv_93 including
an update to GNOME 2.22.2 and fixes to the Caiman "Slim Install" and
the Image Packaging System (IPS). Users who wish to update their
systems
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
> The OpenSolaris development package repository
>
> http://pkg.opensolaris.org/
>
> has been updated to reflect the changes in snv_92 and snv_93 including
> an update to GNOME 2.22.2 and fixes to the Caiman "Slim Install" and
> the Image Packaging System (IPS). Us
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Arne Schwabe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
>> The OpenSolaris development package repository
>>
>> http://pkg.opensolaris.org/
>>
>>
> I just tried that image and ended up with filesystem full errors :(
>
> See screenshot http://plai
Hi,
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] is rumored to have mumbled on 13. Juli 2008 03:17:21
-0700 regarding [indiana-discuss] http://pkg.opensolaris.org/ package
repository update (build 93):
> 4) If you are using a build prior to 93, it is recommended one apply
> the update directly to an alt
>> I just tried that image and ended up with filesystem full errors :(
>>
>> See screenshot http://plai.de/misc/Bild%202.png
>>
>
> well ? is it ? you know ... full ?
>
> Dennis
>
Okay I should have clarified this. This happens when I try to boot the
install cd even before getting to t
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 10:17 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The OpenSolaris development package repository
>
>Primary Languages, gzip compression, 735 MB
>http://dlc.sun.com/torrents/info/osol-0811-93.iso.torrent
>(if burned to media, image should be burned to a DVD)
>
>
self reply :
file: osol-0811-93.iso
size: 771,133,440 (735 MiB)
dest: /export/rsync/OpenSolaris/update/osol-0811-93.iso
progress:
status: finisheding in 1:04:02 (8.0%)
dl speed: 164.4 KB/s
ul speed: 0.0 KB/s
sharing: 0.000 (0.0 MB up / 63.2 MB down)
seeds: 2 seen now, plus 0 distributed copie
Sebastian Hagedorn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] is rumored to have mumbled on 13. Juli 2008 03:17:21
> -0700 regarding [indiana-discuss] http://pkg.opensolaris.org/ package
> repository update (build 93):
>
>> 4) If you are using a build prior to 93, it
> 4) If you are using a build prior to 93, it is recommended one apply
> the update directly to an alternate boot environment. First, display
> the list of the existing BEs on the system
>
> $ beadm list
> BEActive Active on Mountpoint Space
> Name
-- Evan Layton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is rumored to have mumbled on 13. Juli
2008 13:00:54 -0600 regarding Re: [indiana-discuss]
http://pkg.opensolaris.org/ package repository update (build 93):
>> -bash-3.2$ pfexec /usr/sbin/beadm mount opensolaris-2 /mnt
>> beadm: Unable to m
> There is a missing step here:
> $ pfexec beadm unmount opensolaris-
>
>> $ pfexec beadm activate opensolaris-
>>
>
> Make sure to unmount the BE before rebooting or the mountpoints for the
> BE may not be correct on reboot.
Thanks for the clarification, Evan. The "unmount" step thoug
Arne Schwabe schrieb:
>>> I just tried that image and ended up with filesystem full errors :(
>>>
>>> See screenshot http://plai.de/misc/Bild%202.png
>>>
>>>
>> well ? is it ? you know ... full ?
>>
>> Dennis
>>
>>
>
> Okay I should have clarified this. This happens when I try
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 10:17 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The OpenSolaris development package repository
>
>http://pkg.opensolaris.org/
>
I'm in the process of hacking together a page on a mirror in China.
Do you mind if I quote you and possibly change the links a bit for
people ther
Arne Schwabe wrote:
> Arne Schwabe schrieb:
I just tried that image and ended up with filesystem full errors :(
See screenshot http://plai.de/misc/Bild%202.png
>>> well ? is it ? you know ... full ?
>>>
>>> Dennis
>>>
>>>
>> Okay I should have clarifie
> I'm in the process of hacking together a page on a mirror in China.
> Do you mind if I quote you and possibly change the links a bit for
> people there ?
>
> http://blastwave.unix-center.net/OpenSolaris/update_07_Jul_2008.html
Not a problem although I'm going to send out an update set of
instruc
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 3:12 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm in the process of hacking together a page on a mirror in China.
>> Do you mind if I quote you and possibly change the links a bit for
>> people there ?
>>
>> http://blastwave.unix-center.net/OpenSolaris/update_07_Jul_2008.html
>
>
Thank you for bittorrent!!!
I have been getting nowhere with IPS. And I need 90 or better for my wireless
to work.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.or
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 03:17:21AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ISO images are being made available for this build
> via BitTorrent. Torrent files are provided as follows
Will they become available via non-torrent methods too? And if so, will
opensolaris.com be updated?
regards
john
__
John Levon wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 03:17:21AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> ISO images are being made available for this build
>> via BitTorrent. Torrent files are provided as follows
>
> Will they become available via non-torrent methods too? And if so, will
> opensolaris.com be
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 09:12:31PM -0400, Dave Miner wrote:
> >>ISO images are being made available for this build
> >>via BitTorrent. Torrent files are provided as follows
> >
> >Will they become available via non-torrent methods too? And if so, will
> >opensolaris.com be updated?
>
> We're not
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 1:12 AM, Dave Miner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> John Levon wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 03:17:21AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>> ISO images are being made available for this build
>>> via BitTorrent. Torrent files are provided as follows
>>
>> Will they becom
Is there any way to boot using a usb drive? Writing to CDs is notoriously
unreliable, and I have no "clean" CD-RW anyway. I definitely want to test this
release, as the previous release used to lock up at boot due to ACPI issues.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_
Rohan B. Dhruva wrote:
> Is there any way to boot using a usb drive? Writing to CDs is notoriously
> unreliable, and I have no "clean" CD-RW anyway. I definitely want to test
> this release, as the previous release used to lock up at boot due to ACPI
> issues.
We haven't been distributing USB i
John Levon wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 09:12:31PM -0400, Dave Miner wrote:
>
ISO images are being made available for this build
via BitTorrent. Torrent files are provided as follows
>>> Will they become available via non-torrent methods too? And if so, will
>>> opensolaris.com be u
OK, I suppose they will be more useful only after we can make usb
sticks from other OSs.
How about this scenario though - I use the USB image to boot up
OpenSolaris, and make a real physical USB stick using that? Is it
viable? I am going through all this just to avoid scratched CDs ->
failed insta
Rohan Dhruva wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 2:10 AM, Dave Miner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Rohan B. Dhruva wrote:
>>> Is there any way to boot using a usb drive? Writing to CDs is notoriously
>>> unreliable, and I have no "clean" CD-RW anyway. I definitely want to test
>>> this release, as the
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 2:10 AM, Dave Miner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rohan B. Dhruva wrote:
>>
>> Is there any way to boot using a usb drive? Writing to CDs is notoriously
>> unreliable, and I have no "clean" CD-RW anyway. I definitely want to test
>> this release, as the previous release used
> We haven't been distributing USB images, since it
> requires Solaris Express or OpenSolaris to put them on the drive. I
> suppose we can start placing them on the torrent as well, if people would
> find it useful.
That's a great idea, particularily for those who don't have a dvd-writer
in th
I think we should add this bug
(http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6722915) into known issues. For
me it was only one reason to rollback from 93 to 91.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-di
Alexey wrote:
> I think we should add this bug
> (http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6722915) into known issues.
> For me it was only one reason to rollback from 93 to 91.
The fix is targeted for snv_95. FYI.
--
Shawn Walker
___
indiana-d
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 5:17 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The OpenSolaris development package repository
>
>http://pkg.opensolaris.org/
>
> has been updated to reflect the changes in snv_92 and snv_93 including
> an update to GNOME 2.22.2 and fixes to the Caiman "Slim Install" and
> th
I had the same problem; it turned out /mnt was not empty, although it seems
weird. When I removed a couple of directories existing under /mnt, beadm mount
worked fine.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
indiana-discuss mailing list
indian
32 matches
Mail list logo
