Was trying to find out if indy2 can be upgraded via image refresh. but when I
was installing the new SUNWipkg, I get:
# pkg install SUNWipkg
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 607, in ?
ret = main_func()
File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 572, in main_func
install(img,
That's actually exactly what I did last time and this time. As you can see my
clones are already mounted.
# zfs list
NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT
zpl_slim 6.06G 6.37G71K /zpl_slim
zpl_slim/export 3.58G 6.37G19K /export
zpl_slim/export/home 3
Sean Liu wrote:
> Was trying to find out if indy2 can be upgraded via image refresh. but when I
> was installing the new SUNWipkg, I get:
> # pkg install SUNWipkg
Follow the instructions here:
http://opensolaris.org/os/project/indiana/resources/update_guidelines/
This will be much easier (more
* Sean Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-13 17:04]:
> That's actually exactly what I did last time and this time. As you can see my
> clones are already mounted.
> # zfs list
> NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT
> zpl_slim 6.06G 6.37G71K /zpl_slim
> zpl_slim/ex
OK I thought that was for previous release and was trying to be a smart ass :-)
Maybe the step can be a little specific and say use the SUNWipkg that matches
the CURRENT NV version ( 0.75 fro build 75 )
Let's see how the image update goes
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_
yes, but it can be confusing - you are upgrading to b79 but should install the
b75 SUNWipkg - I simply thought the procedure was prepared for b75 upgrades...
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss@o
The image update went OK.
But seems there is some message problem for pkg command:
-bash-3.2# [b]pkg status -u
pkg: no packages installed [/b]
doesn't sound right...
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
indiana-discuss mailing li
On Feb 13, 2008 1:02 PM, Lurie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I second that, please add a comment, it's a common pitfall.
There is actually a comment on the upgrading page about that already.
It notes the important of specifying the version of the package when
installing it.
--
Shawn Walker, Soft
I second that, please add a comment, it's a common pitfall.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
I still think it's a wee misleading, one assumes that he/she already has the 75
version.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-d
10 matches
Mail list logo
