Moinak Ghosh wrote:
Roland Mainz wrote:
Ian Murdock wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
However, initially the most sane appraoch is to pick one filesystem
so that the initial effort can be focused on a great experience and
take advantage of that filesystem's features.
Agreed. This is all
Roland Mainz wrote:
Ian Murdock wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
However, initially the most sane appraoch is to pick one filesystem
so that the initial effort can be focused on a great experience and
take advantage of that filesystem's features.
Agreed. This is all about keeping the
Ian Murdock wrote:
> Shawn Walker wrote:
> > However, initially the most sane appraoch is to pick one filesystem
> > so that the initial effort can be focused on a great experience and
> > take advantage of that filesystem's features.
>
> Agreed. This is all about keeping the focus tight. In terms
On 26/06/07, Peter Tribble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/24/07, Roland Mainz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ian Murdock wrote:
> >
> > One thing I don't see on the requirements list is ZFS as the default
> > file system.
> >
> > This really needs to be there. It's one of the killer features of
>
On 6/24/07, Roland Mainz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ian Murdock wrote:
>
> One thing I don't see on the requirements list is ZFS as the default
> file system.
>
> This really needs to be there. It's one of the killer features of
> Solaris, and we should make sure we use it to maximum advantage.
Stephen Hahn wrote:
* Moinak Ghosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-25 07:36]:
ZFS is unsuitable for a LiveCD. In fact for a LiveCD all that is
required is a minimal, ramdisk based R/W filesystem and a CDROM
filesystem. For that matter even UFS is a bit heavyweight for a
ramdisk based filesystem.
* Moinak Ghosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-25 07:36]:
> ZFS is unsuitable for a LiveCD. In fact for a LiveCD all that is
> required is a minimal, ramdisk based R/W filesystem and a CDROM
> filesystem. For that matter even UFS is a bit heavyweight for a
> ramdisk based filesystem.
Could you give
Shawn Walker wrote:
However, initially the most sane appraoch is to pick one filesystem
so that the initial effort can be focused on a great experience and
take advantage of that filesystem's features.
Agreed. This is all about keeping the focus tight. In terms of "bang for
the buck", we can't
Roland Mainz wrote:
John Sonnenschein wrote:
[...]
For example if we were to do a ZFS snapshot prior to upgrading or
installing a package, that feature is obviously not available with
other filesystems, but we shouldn't restrict ourselves to not doing it
just because UFS is braindead technolo
On 24/06/07, Roland Mainz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ian Murdock wrote:
>
> One thing I don't see on the requirements list is ZFS as the default
> file system.
>
> This really needs to be there. It's one of the killer features of
> Solaris, and we should make sure we use it to maximum advantage.
Roland Mainz wrote:
> John Sonnenschein wrote:
> > On 6/24/07, Roland Mainz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Ian Murdock wrote:
> [snip]
> > > Or short: IMO it would be nice to keep support for alternatives in
> > > Solaris/OpenSolaris/Indiana alive...
> >
> > I agree, in as far as I personally thi
John Sonnenschein wrote:
> On 6/24/07, Roland Mainz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ian Murdock wrote:
[snip]
> > Or short: IMO it would be nice to keep support for alternatives in
> > Solaris/OpenSolaris/Indiana alive...
>
> I agree, in as far as I personally think ZFS should be the default,
> and
I agree, in as far as I personally think ZFS should be the default,
and we should build around that assumption while retaining the ability
to choose other options, with feature degredation.
For example if we were to do a ZFS snapshot prior to upgrading or
installing a package, that feature is obv
Ian Murdock wrote:
>
> One thing I don't see on the requirements list is ZFS as the default
> file system.
>
> This really needs to be there. It's one of the killer features of
> Solaris, and we should make sure we use it to maximum advantage.
I agree but it would be nice to keep some room for a
14 matches
Mail list logo
