[efloraofindia:247346] Species & genera pages of ‎‎‎‎‎‎‎Bignoniaceae‎ are now with images

Dear members, Species & genera pages of *‎‎‎*(*‎‎‎Bignoniaceae ‎*) in efloraofindia are now with images. This work was done by mainly me, Singh ji & Bhagyashri Ranade ji. It is one of the big families in efi & the work st

Re: [efloraofindia:247344] Re: GRAM 2016 - Requesting ID

Thanks, Radha ji, for the feedback. On 16 July 2016 at 08:53, radha veach wrote: > It looks like Embelia tsjeriam-cottam > > regards > Radha > > > On Friday, July 15, 2016 at 10:19:11 PM UTC+5:30, Ganga wrote: >> >> GRAM 20160715 >> >> Request

Re: [efloraofindia:247343] Re: Kalatope id al190411

Thanks, Anil ji. Calyx seems certainly different from other two species. However does not seem to match with illustration at http://www.efloras.org/object_page.aspx?object_id=4701&flora_id=2 As per keys at FOC ( http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=210001250), it appears more

Re: [efloraofindia:247342] Names of Plants in India :: Gymnema sylvestre (Retz.) R.Br. ex Sm.

Wonderful compilation, Dinesh ji. On 15 July 2016 at 20:44, Dinesh Valke wrote: > via Species > ‎ > ‎G > ‎ > ‎ > *Gymnema sylvestre* (Retz.) R.Br. ex Sm. ... *family*:

[efloraofindia:247340] Re: SK34JUL15-2016:ID

Thanks, Saroj ji. Liked the 1st one most. On 15 July 2016 at 20:29, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > Dear Mr. Garg, > > Ophiopogon dracaenoides ?? > > Enclosing some pictures for identification verification. > > Location : Godawari Botanical Garden Nepal > > Altitude: 5000 ft. > > Date: 13 July 2016 > >

[efloraofindia:247340] Re: SK33JUL15-2016:ID

Thanks, Saroj ji, for the beautiful pictures. On 15 July 2016 at 19:27, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > Dear Mr. Garg, > > Ophiopogon intermedius ?? > > Enclosing some pictures for identification verification. > > Location : Mudhe Dolakha Nepal > > Altitude: 6700ft. > > Date: 823 July 2014 > > Thank y

[efloraofindia:247339] Re: SK32JUL15-2016:ID

Thanks, Saroj ji. On 15 July 2016 at 18:59, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > Dear Mr. Garg,? > > Enclosing some pictures for identification please.. > > Location : Mudhe Dolakha Nepal > > Altitude: 6700ft. > > Date: 23 July 2014 > > Thank you. > Saroj Kasaju > -- With regards, J.M.Garg 'Creating a

Re: [efloraofindia:247338] Re: Important change- Displaying unidentified threads at top

Thanks, Anil ji. For me it will not be difficult at all. On 15 July 2016 at 20:28, Anil Thakur wrote: > Garg Ji > > It will surely help in identification of unidentified photographs and is a > good step. But, it will be a difficult task for you to manage huge piles of > unidentified plants. > >

Re: [efloraofindia:247337] Rosaceae Sp - at Dras region-J&K- July-PKA-32

In this photo from Prashant Awale, from Drass, the fruits do not seem to have neck? So, is this *R. webbianna*? ​ On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 8:36 PM, Anil Thakur wrote: > Beautiful photographs, Prashant ji. > These two species can be very easily differentiated on the basis of > peculiar hip/frui

[efloraofindia:247336] Re: GRAM 2016 - Requesting ID

It looks like Embelia tsjeriam-cottam regards Radha On Friday, July 15, 2016 at 10:19:11 PM UTC+5:30, Ganga wrote: > > GRAM 20160715 > > Requesting ID of this Shrub. Unfortunately I did not manage to get habit > shots. > > These were clicked at Kasara, Maharashtra in J

[efloraofindia:247334] ID request of a plant seen in Bengaluru

Is it not Euphorbia hypericifolia -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to indiantreepix+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, se

[efloraofindia:247334] ID request of a plant seen in Bengaluru

Is it not Euphorbia hypericifolia -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to indiantreepix+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, se

[efloraofindia:247334] ID request of a plant seen in Bengaluru

Is it not Euphorbia hypericifolia -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to indiantreepix+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, se

Re: [efloraofindia:247331] GRAM 2016 Rubiaceae for ID

Thank you Sir On 15 July 2016 at 12:08, vipl...@gmail.com wrote: > > Looks like *Meyna laxiflora* Robyns [Rubiaceae] to me. > > Best wishes, Viplav > > El 15 de julio de 2016, 10:18, J.M. Garg escribió: > >> >> Liked the 2nd one most. >> >> On 14 July 2016 at 19:34, Ganeshram Esh wrote: >> >>>

Re: [efloraofindia:247330] ID request of a plant seen in Bengaluru

Kindly forward it to Dr. N. P. Balakrishnan, npbal...@gmail.com On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 7:33 PM, wrote: > This plant WAS aplenty in my village in Kerala. It was a pleasant surprise > when I saw it in Bengaluru after about 45 years.. Kindly identify the > plant. Image is attached. > Thank you ve

[efloraofindia:247329] Re: Kalatope id al190411

To me, it appears more like Mazus delavayi. Three species (M. delavayi, M. pumilus and M. surculosus) are reported to occur in Chamba district (H.P). by Singh and Sharma Regards ANIL THAKUR On Thursday, 14 July 2016 13:10:55 UTC+5:30, JM Garg wrote: > > To me it appears more closer to the image

[efloraofindia:247328] Names of Plants in India :: Gymnema sylvestre (Retz.) R.Br. ex Sm.

via Species ‎ > ‎G ‎ > ‎ *Gymnema sylvestre* (Retz.) R.Br. ex Sm. ... *family*: Apocynaceae ~ Asclepiadaceae [image: Gymnema sylvestre (Retz.) R.Br. ex Sm.]

Re: [efloraofindia:247327] Rosaceae Sp - at Dras region-J&K- July-PKA-32

Beautiful photographs, Prashant ji. These two species can be very easily differentiated on the basis of peculiar hip/fruit shapes. Thank you, Dr. Gurcharan Singh Sir for posting photographs of fruits of both. I have photographs only of R. macrophylla with me. Regards ANIL THAKUR On Friday, 15

[efloraofindia:247324] Re: Important change- Displaying unidentified threads at top

Garg Ji It will surely help in identification of unidentified photographs and is a good step. But, it will be a difficult task for you to manage huge piles of unidentified plants. Regards ANIL THAKUR On Monday, 11 July 2016 11:33:40 UTC+5:30, JM Garg wrote: > > Dear members, > In future we wi

Re: [efloraofindia:247323] Garden Climber for ID : Srinagar : 251011 : AK-3

Garg Ji, Both Clematis plants were observed in the same place. Mughal Garden Shalimar. Regards, Aarti On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 11:03 AM, J.M. Garg wrote: > This may also be Clematis 'Carnaby' as per another thread > . > >

[efloraofindia:247319] Radermachera page (‎‎‎‎‎‎‎Bignoniaceae‎) with images of species in efloraofindia

Dear members, Pl. go through *‎**Radermachera* page (*Bignoniaceae* ‎) with images of species in efloraofindia (done by me). If you fi

Re: Fwd: [efloraofindia:247318] Plant for ID, Sikkim NAW-JUL16-15

Thanks, Sanjyoti ji. On 15 July 2016 at 16:41, sanjyoti234 wrote: > Begonia > > > *** This message has been sent using GIONEE P3 *** > > "J.M. Garg" wrote: > > Forwarding again for Id assistance please. > > Some earlier relevant feedback: > > Some Begonia spp.- from Gurinder ji > Pl. check com

[efloraofindia:247317] Re: SYMBIOSIS : 826

Thanks, Bimal ji, for the beautiful observation. On 15 July 2016 at 16:35, Bimal Sar kar wrote: > Dear Friend, >Attaching an image of a Asiatic Pied Starling > feeding on the fruits of Santalum album ( CHANDAN ). > Regards, > -- W

Re: Fwd: [efloraofindia:247316] Plant for ID, Sikkim NAW-JUL16-15

Begonia *** This message has been sent using GIONEE P3 *** "J.M. Garg" wrote: >Forwarding again for Id assistance please. > >Some earlier relevant feedback: > >Some Begonia spp.- from Gurinder ji >Pl. check comparative images of different species in efi at Begonia >

[efloraofindia:247315] SYMBIOSIS : 826

Dear Friend, Attaching an image of a Asiatic Pied Starling feeding on the fruits of Santalum album ( CHANDAN ). Regards, -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe

Re: [efloraofindia:247314] Re: Sleepless nights

Thanks, Tapas ji. On 15 July 2016 at 15:12, Tapas Chakrabarty wrote: > Kindly look at the attachment which I support. > > On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Pankaj Kumar > wrote: > >> I know about the confidence percentage. But in that case, should I >> describe them as new species? And yes the p

Fwd: [efloraofindia:247313] A little yollow flower

Forwarding again for Id assistance please. -- Forwarded message -- From: Paul Cabrol Date: 12 July 2016 at 15:49 Subject: [efloraofindia:247141] A little yollow flower To: efloraofindia Hello I think the Brassicaceae family

Re: [efloraofindia:247311] Re: Sleepless nights

Kindly look at the attachment which I support. On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Pankaj Kumar wrote: > I know about the confidence percentage. But in that case, should I > describe them as new species? And yes the percentage was sometimes above > 95, up to 98% in many cases. How many times do you

Re: [efloraofindia:247310] Liane à fleur rose

Thanks a lot, Rawat ji. On 15 July 2016 at 14:13, D.S Rawat wrote: > Hemiphragma heterophyllum Wall. (Plantaginaceae). > Earlier it was placed in Scrophulariaceae. > Please see also the eFI page >

Re: [efloraofindia:247309] Liane à fleur rose

Hemiphragma heterophyllum Wall. (Plantaginaceae). Earlier it was placed in Scrophulariaceae. Please see also the eFI page on this sepecies. DSRawat Pantnagar Dr D.S.Rawat Department o

Re: [efloraofindia:247308] Re: Sleepless nights

I know about the confidence percentage. But in that case, should I describe them as new species? And yes the percentage was sometimes above 95, up to 98% in many cases. How many times do you really get a 100% match? Two accessions of same species with correct id, same sequence length, but from Indi

Re: [efloraofindia:247307] Re: Sleepless nights

Just reflecting on this statement, PK: "How much can we rely on DNA sequences is a matter of judgement. I have been working on it, and sorry to say but I have felt many times that i cant rely on it. I sequenced my known and well identified plants and many of the sequences matched with sequences of

Fwd: [efloraofindia:247306] Gentiana albicalyx??

Forwarding again for Id confirmation or otherwise please. Some earlier relevant feedback: One image of Gentiana albicalyx I could find on net: http://zlgc.swfc.edu.cn/jpkc/zwx/web/new/ShowArticle.asp?ArticleID=1361 -- Forwarded message -- From: Paul Cabrol Date: 11 July 2016 a

Re: Fwd: [efloraofindia:247304] Jacunia rucemosa?

Thanks, Dinesh ji & Pradip ji. I think matches with images at Jacquinia racemosa On 15 July 2016 at 12:47, DINESH ALBERTSON wrote: > Dear sir > Were you able to confirm and fix identity of the

Fwd: [efloraofindia:247305] Liane à fleur rose

Forwarding again for Id assistance please. -- Forwarded message -- From: Paul Cabrol Date: 11 July 2016 at 18:03 Subject: [efloraofindia:247081] Liane à fleur rose To: efloraofindia Bonjour à tous! Je ne trouve rien qui se rapproche de cette plante, aucune idées!

[efloraofindia:247302] Re: SK30JUL7-2016:ID

Thank you ! On 15 Jul 2016 12:49, "J.M. Garg" wrote: > I think it is not required now. > > On 15 July 2016 at 12:08, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > >> Dear Mr. Garg , >> >> Do we need further verification from Mr. Weber? >> >> Thank you. >> >> Saroj Kasaju >> >> On 15 Jul 2016 10:30, "J.M. Garg" wrote

Fwd: Fwd: [efloraofindia:247301] MS July, 2016/02 Herb for ID

-- Forwarded message -- From: M Sawmliana Date: 11 July 2016 at 19:04 Subject: Re: Fwd: [efloraofindia:246734] MS July, 2016/02 Herb for ID To: "J. M. Garg" Thanks a lot Samiran ji On Jul 11, 2016 4:36 PM, "J.M. Garg" wrote: > Thanks, Samiran ji. > > -- Forwarded messa

Fwd: [efloraofindia:247299] Garden Climber for ID : Srinagar : 251011 : AK-3

This may also be Clematis 'Carnaby' as per another thread . -- Forwarded message -- From: Aarti S. Khale Date: 25 October 2011 at 19:07 Subject: [efloraofindia:89757] Garden Climber for ID : Srinagar : 251011 : AK-

[efloraofindia:247299] Re: SK30JUL7-2016:ID

I think it is not required now. On 15 July 2016 at 12:08, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > Dear Mr. Garg , > > Do we need further verification from Mr. Weber? > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > On 15 Jul 2016 10:30, "J.M. Garg" wrote: > >> Thanks, Saroj ji, >> Yeah, it appears close to images of Didymoc