[efloraofindia:253436] Fwd: TACCA SPECIES

I think it should be *Tacca chantrieri* as per images herein. -- Forwarded message -- From: Bimal Sar kar Date: 30 August 2016 at 20:36 Subject: TACCA SPECIES To: Cc: eflo

Fwd: [efloraofindia:253435] Tree for identification. Assam

-- Forwarded message -- From: M Swamy Date: 11 October 2016 at 11:39 Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:253434] Tree for identification. Assam To: efloraofindia Cc: Kiran Srivastava My question is not answered i.e. How can one differentiate T.citrina from T.chebula. On Mon, Nov 18,

Re: [efloraofindia:253434] Tree for identification. Assam

My question is not answered i.e. How can one differentiate T.citrina from T.chebula. On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Mahadeswara wrote: > The fruits look similar to T.chebula. How can one differentiate the > fruits. > > On Saturday, November 16, 2013 10:58:24 PM UTC+5:30, Vijayasankar wrote

[efloraofindia:253427] Re: Species, genera & family pages of‎‎‎ ‎Daphniphyllaceae are now with images

Thanks, Tapas ji. On 10 October 2016 at 21:49, Tapas Chakrabarty wrote: > Nice page. > > On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 5:00 PM, J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Dear members, >> >> Species, genera & family pages of*‎‎‎* *‎**Daphniphyllaceae* >>

Re: [efloraofindia:253427] Re: Ladakh flora 8-up

Hi, Ushaprabha ji. You have forgotten to attach any images. On 10 October 2016 at 22:37, ushaprabha page wrote: > other images are almost same. I have sent the best one pl. > > ushaprabha. > > On 10 October 2016 at 20:17, J.M. Garg wrote: > >> >> -- Forwarded message -- >> From:

[efloraofindia:253427] Re: Species, genera & family pages of‎‎‎ ‎Combretaceae are now with images

Thanks a lot, Tapas ji, for the feedback. On 10 October 2016 at 22:38, Tapas Chakrabarty wrote: > I am highly impressed with the Combretaceae page, though full > representation will take time. > > Combretum wallichii var. flagrocarpum is best treated as a distinct > species, Combretum flagrocarp

[efloraofindia:253425] Ladakh flora 11. ,up.

Lycium ruthenicum -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to indiantreepix+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send an email to indiantree

[efloraofindia:253424] Re: Mazus surculosus ?

Thanks Chris. I agree, this needs further consideration. Regards, Ashwini > On 10 Oct 2016, at 18:22, C CHADWELL wrote: > > The additional observations and photos are helpful. > > I think this illustrates that this genus needs further study/checking. > > > Best Wishes, > > > Chris Chadwell

[efloraofindia:253418] Re: Species, genera & family pages of‎‎‎ ‎Combretaceae are now with images

I am highly impressed with the Combretaceae page, though full representation will take time. Combretum wallichii var. flagrocarpum is best treated as a distinct species, Combretum flagrocarpum. Terminalia species, Kaziranga, Assam = T. citrina. Terminalia travancorensis Wight & Arn. is a poorly

Re: [efloraofindia:253417] Re: Ladakh flora 8-up

other images are almost same. I have sent the best one pl. ushaprabha. On 10 October 2016 at 20:17, J.M. Garg wrote: > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: chrischadwell...@btinternet.com > Date: 10 October 2016 at 20:16 > Subject: [efloraofindia:253406] Re: Ladakh flora 8-up > To

[efloraofindia:253416] Re: Fwd: Impatiens insignis DC. (accepted name)

Thank you! On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 9:57 PM, Wojciech Adamowski wrote: > Looks very similar to old drawing in > > Wallich, N., Plantae Asiaticae Rariores, vol. 2 (1831 > > > Wallich, N., Plantae Asiaticae Ra

Re: [efloraofindia:253414] SK140OCT10-2016:ID

Lauraceae? On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 7:18 PM, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > Dear Members, > > Sharing some pictures for ID shot at Kurintar Nepal on 29 December 2013 at > 1000 ft. > > Request for validation . > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed t

[efloraofindia:253412] Re: Species, genera & family pages of‎‎‎ ‎Daphniphyllaceae are now with images

Nice page. On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 5:00 PM, J.M. Garg wrote: > Dear members, > > Species, genera & family pages of*‎‎‎* *‎**Daphniphyllaceae* > > are now with images. I request you to pl. go through & point out mistak

Re: [efloraofindia:253411] Lamiaceae herb in Nilgiris for ID :: MK008 SEP2016

Thank you all for the help in ID. On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 4:53 PM, J.M. Garg wrote: > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: M Swamy > Date: 10 October 2016 at 16:51 > Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:253114] Lamiaceae herb in Nilgiris for ID :: > MK008 SEP2016 > To: Vijayasankar Raman ,

[efloraofindia:253410] Re: Fwd: Impatiens insignis DC. (accepted name)

Looks very similar to old drawing in Wallich, N., Plantae Asiaticae Rariores, vol. 2 (1831 | | | Wallich, N., Plantae Asiaticae Rariores, vol. 2 (1831 | | | Congratulations!Best regards               Wojciech -- You received this message because you are subscribed to

[efloraofindia:253406] Species, genera & family pages of‎‎‎ Dilleniaceae‎ are now with images

Dear members, Species, genera & family pages of*‎‎‎* *Dilleniaceae* *‎* are now with images. I request you to pl. go through & point out mistakes, if any. I hope this will aid in identifications in future. -- With regards,

Fwd: [efloraofindia:253406] Re: Ladakh flora 8-up

-- Forwarded message -- From: chrischadwell...@btinternet.com Date: 10 October 2016 at 20:16 Subject: [efloraofindia:253406] Re: Ladakh flora 8-up To: efloraofindia Cannot view any images? On Sunday, October 9, 2016 at 7:10:59 PM UTC+1, Ushaprabha wrote: > > Id of the plant pl

[efloraofindia:253406] Re: Ladakh flora 8-up

Cannot view any images? On Sunday, October 9, 2016 at 7:10:59 PM UTC+1, Ushaprabha wrote: > > Id of the plant pl -near a gorge in Hemis sanctuary after crossing > Kongmaru la. > -no flwers plant with fruits only. > > ushaprabha. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

[efloraofindia:253402] Re: TSP-OCT2016-02-439:Images of Dendrobium lawianum (Orchidaceae)

Thanks Pankaj ji regards On 10 Oct 2016 17:58, "Dr Pankaj Kumar" wrote: > Very nice. > Yes I also consider them as separate species and this is lawianum. > Thanks a lot for sharing. > This is not the flowering time!! > Pankaj > > > On Saturday, 8 October 2016 00:03:24 UTC+8, tsp kumar wrote: >>

[efloraofindia:253398] Fwd: Species, genera & family pages of‎‎‎ ‎Celastraceae are now with images

Thanks, Dr. Archer. -- Forwarded message -- From: Robert H. Archer Date: 10 October 2016 at 18:48 Subject: RE: Species, genera & family pages of‎‎‎ ‎Celastraceae are now with images To: "J.M. Garg" Dear J.M Garg, ji Thank you very much for sending the summary list of Indian C

[efloraofindia:253398] Re: SK139OCT09-2016:ID

*Salvia plebeia *R.Br. (accepted name) ??? On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 11:13 PM, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > Dear Members, > > Sharing some pictures for ID ( though not good quality) shot at Bhotechaur > Nepal on 28 September 2013 at 5000 ft. > > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > -- You received this messag

Re: [efloraofindia:253396] Re: Waldheimia vestita (Hook. f. et Thoms. ex C. B. Clarke) Pamp.

Thanks for information from Hooker, which whilst helpful and some of the content may still hold true,we must always remember that FBI is very much out-of-date and whilst Hooker and the othercontributors did a remarkable job in the 19th century with strictly limited material and often scrappy, p

Fwd: [efloraofindia:253394] VALMIKI : OBSERVER OF NATURE 45

-- Forwarded message -- From: Bimal Sar kar Date: 10 October 2016 at 18:25 Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:82449] VALMIKI : OBSERVER OF NATURE 45 To: "J.M. Garg" Dear Gargji. The image is of Diospyros montana. As a non botanist I depended on botanical literature for identity. There

[efloraofindia:253391] Re: Fwd: SK56JUL27-2016:ID

These images taken at Sangam, Leh initially defeated me but I am now thinkingabout the possibility of Lepidium latifolium (or perhaps L.obtusum) - though I am not certain about distinguishingbetween the two, particularly as the 3 images only reveal a few clues. I have just noticed in 'Vascular p

[efloraofindia:253388] Re: TSP-OCT2016-02-439:Images of Dendrobium lawianum (Orchidaceae)

Very nice. Yes I also consider them as separate species and this is lawianum. Thanks a lot for sharing. This is not the flowering time!! Pankaj On Saturday, 8 October 2016 00:03:24 UTC+8, tsp kumar wrote: > > Dear friends, > > > > Presenting few images of *Dendrobium lawianum * ( Orchidaceae )

[efloraofindia:253388] Species, genera & family pages of‎‎‎ Didiereaceae‎ are now with images

Dear members, Species, genera & family pages of*‎‎‎* *Didiereaceae* *‎* are now with images. I request you to pl. go through & point out mistakes, if any. I hope this will aid in identifications in future. -- With regards,

[efloraofindia:253387] Species, genera & family pages of‎‎‎ ‎Dichapetalaceae‎ are now with images

Dear members, Species, genera & family pages of*‎‎‎* *‎**Dichapetalaceae* *‎* are now with images. I request you to pl. go through & point out mistakes, if any. I hope this will aid in identifications in future. -- With

[efloraofindia:253386] Species, genera & family pages of‎‎‎ ‎Diapensiaceae are now with images

Dear members, Species, genera & family pages of*‎‎‎* *‎**Diapensiaceae* are now with images. I request you to pl. go through & point out mistakes, if any. I hope this will aid in identifications in future. -- With regards

[efloraofindia:253385] Species, genera & family pages of‎‎‎ ‎Datiscaceae are now with images

Dear members, Species, genera & family pages of*‎‎‎* *‎**Datiscaceae* are now with images. I request you to pl. go through & point out mistakes, if any. I hope this will aid in identifications in future. -- With regards, J

[efloraofindia:253384] Species, genera & family pages of‎‎‎ ‎Daphniphyllaceae are now with images

Dear members, Species, genera & family pages of*‎‎‎* *‎**Daphniphyllaceae* are now with images. I request you to pl. go through & point out mistakes, if any. I hope this will aid in identifications in future. -- With r

Re: Fwd: [efloraofindia:253382] Fwd: Anogeissus sericea

Garg ji, When some closely related species are involved, as in the present case, it is indeed difficult to determine the species and their varieties with accuracy without measurements and nature of indumentum especially in Anogeissus. Regards, Tapas. On Oct 10, 2016 3:28 PM, "J.M. Garg" wrote: >

Fwd: [efloraofindia:253382] Lamiaceae herb in Nilgiris for ID :: MK008 SEP2016

-- Forwarded message -- From: M Swamy Date: 10 October 2016 at 16:51 Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:253114] Lamiaceae herb in Nilgiris for ID :: MK008 SEP2016 To: Vijayasankar Raman , "J.M. Garg" < jmga...@gmail.com> I think Dr Vijayasankar's ID is correct. On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at

[efloraofindia:253381] Species, genera & family pages of‎‎‎ ‎Combretaceae are now with images

Dear members, Species, genera & family pages of*‎‎‎* *‎**Combretaceae* are now with images. I request you to pl. go through & point out mistakes, if any. I hope this will aid in identifications in future. -- With regards,

Fwd: [efloraofindia:253380] Crassulaceae, Combretaceae and Myrtaceae Fortnight: Combretaceae- Anoegesus sericea?? at Nagpur -PKA-DEC20::

-- Forwarded message -- From: Satish Phadke Date: 3 January 2015 at 22:59 Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:209979] Crassulaceae, Combretaceae and Myrtaceae Fortnight: Combretaceae- Anoegesus sericea?? at Nagpur -PKA-DEC20:: To: Tapas Chakrabarty Cc: "J.M. Garg" , efloraofindia < indian

Re: [efloraofindia:253379] Ladakh flora 9 up

Thanks, Ushaprabha ji. Pl. send more images. On 10 October 2016 at 15:06, ushaprabha page wrote: > Id of the plant from Ladakh. > I don`t remember the exact location pl. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "efloraofindia" group. > To unsubscribe

Re: [efloraofindia:253376] Ladakh flora 10

Thanks, Ushaprabha ji. First image is too small. Also give more details. On 10 October 2016 at 15:27, ushaprabha page wrote: > Id of the plant pl. > > Pl excuse me if it is sent for id before, I don`t remember. > > ushaprabha page. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed t

Fwd: [efloraofindia:253376] Fwd: Anogeissus sericea

Thanks, Tapas ji. But the images at *Anogeissus sericea* seem to look different. -- Forwarded message -- From: Tapas Chakrabarty Date: 10 October 2016 at 15:15 Subject: Re: [e

Re: [efloraofindia:253374] Crassulaceae, Combretaceae and Myrtaceae Fortnight: Combretaceae- Anoegesus sericea?? at Nagpur -PKA-DEC20::

To begin with, I would rather try to know the family and they would proceed for generic identity. On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 2:50 PM, J.M. Garg wrote: > It appears to be *Anogeissus acuminata* >

Re: [efloraofindia:253373] Fwd: Anogeissus for ID

It is not possible to identify the images conclusively without knowing the measurement of the leaves and indumentum, particularly of the calyx, if any. Tentatively it may be assigned to Anogeissus acuminata var. fischerei. On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 2:44 PM, JM Garg wrote: > I think *Anogeissus acu

[efloraofindia:253370] Fwd: Anogeissus sericea

I think *Anogeissus acuminata* only. On Tuesday, 11 March 2008 20:23:05 UTC+5:30, satish phadke wrote: > > > These flowers were shot today 11th March2008 in Kothrud area > Pune,Maharashtra.I think it is Anogeis

[efloraofindia:253369] Re: SK133OCT06-2016:ID

Dear Mr. Garg, I guess the plant is : *Erythranthe nepalensis *(Benth.) G.L.Nesom (accepted name) [image: 1 literature reference for Erythranthe nepalensis (Benth.) G.L.Nesom] Synonyms: *Mimulus assamicus*

Re: [efloraofindia:253366] Re: SK97SEP12-1016:ID

Dear all, Awaiting final verdict from the experts. Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 1:05 AM, Vijayasankar Raman < vijay.botan...@gmail.com> wrote: > The pictures of *C. nepalensis* at this link http://www.hkwildlife.net/ > Forum/viewthread.php?tid=50232 look very different from

[efloraofindia:253364] Species, genera & family pages of‎‎‎ ‎Colchicaceae are now with images

Dear members, Species, genera & family pages of*‎‎‎* *‎**Colchicaceae* are now with images. I request you to pl. go through & point out mistakes, if any. I hope this will aid in identifications in future. -- With regards,

[efloraofindia:253360] Species, genera & family pages of‎‎‎ ‎Clusiaceae are now with images

Dear members, Species, genera & family pages of*‎‎‎* *‎**Clusiaceae* are now with images. I request you to pl. go through & point out mistakes, if any. I hope this will aid in identifications in future. -- With regards, J.M