[efloraofindia:363595] Fwd: Shillong plant for ID - 8

Forwarding for ID Distributed as Schima species ?- Shillong, Meghalaya Group discussion at https://groups.google.com/g/indiantreepix/c/7KPuami-z60 -- Forwarded message -

Re: [efloraofindia:363595] Shillong plant for ID - 8

Forwarding for ID Distributed as Schima species ?- Shillong, Meghalaya Group discussion at https://groups.google.com/g/indiantreepix/c/7KPuami-z60 On Monday, November 6, 2017 at 4:09:39 PM

[efloraofindia:363593] Re: Ornamental Lilies for ID : Bangalore : 28OCT20 : AK-48

Thanks a lot Mahadeswara Ji. Regards, Aarti On Thursday, October 29, 2020 at 9:45:08 AM UTC+5:30, Mahadeswara wrote: > > Possibly Crinum species. Also check > https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species/a---l/a/amaryllidaceae/crinum/crinum-amabile > > On Thursday, October 29, 2020 at

[efloraofindia:363590] Re: Ornamental Lilies for ID : Bangalore : 28OCT20 : AK-48

Possibly Crinum species. Also check https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species/a---l/a/amaryllidaceae/crinum/crinum-amabile On Thursday, October 29, 2020 at 9:39:44 AM UTC+5:30, Mahadeswara wrote: > > I think I have posted earlier . I will check and let you know whether the > plant

[efloraofindia:363588] Re: Ornamental Lilies for ID : Bangalore : 28OCT20 : AK-48

I think I have posted earlier . I will check and let you know whether the plant is same. On Wednesday, October 28, 2020 at 9:30:46 PM UTC+5:30, Aarti S. Khale wrote: > > Cultivated Lilies seen in August. > These are similar to the ones seen in Flower Show in Mumbai. > Aarti > -- You received

[efloraofindia:363587] Re: Orchid for ID : Lalbagh Botanical Garden Nursery, Bangalore : 28OCT20 : AK-50

Spathoglottis Species? Aarti On Wednesday, October 28, 2020 at 9:39:58 PM UTC+5:30, Aarti S. Khale wrote: > > A cultivated Orchid seen at the nursery. > Aarti > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group

Re: [efloraofindia:363586] Grass for ID : Delhi : 24JUL19 : AK-33

Resurfacing for Species id. Aarti On Wednesday, August 7, 2019 at 12:41:54 PM UTC+5:30, JM Garg wrote: > > Forwarding again for Id assistance please. > > Some earlier relevant feedback: > Cymbopogon sp. > With kind regards. > > Paradesi A. > > > -- Forwarded

Re: [efloraofindia:363584] Asteraceae for ID : Bangalore : 29SEP20 : AK-26

I think all this confusion is because the leaves are not in focus, i cant discern the leaf margin with any great confidence. i am sure Mr Garg had the same concern. *Cant see the original image that was posted on 22nd October 2020. where is it?* *still the basal auricle shape is visible in first

Re: [efloraofindia:363583] 7 identify weed plant

Dear Garg ji, Paradesi ji, Saroj ji, all Members, Thank you very much for identified the weed plant. With regards, Sam On Mon, 26 Oct 2020, 1:30 pm J.M. Garg, wrote: > Thanks, Sam ji. > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Sam Kuzhalanattu > Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 at 13:25 >

Re: [efloraofindia:363581] Identification of plant

Amaranthaceae ?? Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 6:34 PM binay das wrote: > please identify this wild plant, Its from Karbi Anglong (Assam) > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "efloraofindia" group. > To unsubscribe from this

Re: [efloraofindia:363580] Fwd: Cactus For ID : Nasik : 050714 : AK-8

I think it is not matching with Mammillaria glass ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 7:36 PM Aarti S. Khale wrote: > Thanks Garg Ji. > Will try searching further. > Regards, > Aarti > > On Wednesday, October 28, 2020 at 11:48:31 AM UTC+5:30, JM Garg wrote: >> >> Looks somewhat

[efloraofindia:363578] Image of new combination Glinus lotoides subsp. hirtus published by M.R. Almeida in Fl. Maharashtra 2: 342

May I request anyone to pl. assist in the matter as per request below: I hope you are doing well. I need a page with the new combination Glinus lotoides subsp. hirtus published by M.R. Almeida in Fl. Maharashtra 2: 342. Could you please help me to find out an image of this page. Thank you very

[efloraofindia:363575] Orchid for ID : Lalbagh Botanical Garden Nursery, Bangalore : 28OCT20 : AK-49

A cultivated Orchid seen at the nursery. Aarti -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to indiantreepix+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this

Re: [efloraofindia:363572] Re: Cactus For ID : Mahabaleshwar : 080714 : AK-13

Thanks Garg Ji. Looks more close to Mammillaria grahamii to me. Regards, Aarti On Wednesday, October 28, 2020 at 6:12:02 PM UTC+5:30, JM Garg wrote: > > Yes, possible as per > > http://www.llifle.com/Encyclopedia/CACTI/Family/Cactaceae/5362/Mammillaria_albicans_subs._fraileana > > We have one

Re: [efloraofindia:363571] Begonia Species for ID : Nasik : 26OCT20 : AK-46

Thanks Garg Ji. Regards, Aarti On Wednesday, October 28, 2020 at 4:12:55 PM UTC+5:30, JM Garg wrote: > > Thanks, Saroj ji, for the id. > Yes, appears close as per Wikimedia Commons > : > >

[efloraofindia:363570] Re: Ixora Species for ID : Lalbagh, Bangalore : 15MAY20 : AK-4

Thanks Mahadeswara Ji. It was a suggested id, hope to get it validated. Regards, Aarti On Wednesday, October 28, 2020 at 5:03:05 PM UTC+5:30, Mahadeswara wrote: > > Beautiful. A very rare variety. >> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: [efloraofindia:363569] Cactus for ID : Lalbagh Botanical Garden Nursery, Bangalore : 17OCT20 : AK-26

Thanks for the id Maanas Ji. I had suggested the same earlier. Regards, Aarti On Wednesday, October 28, 2020 at 4:54:52 PM UTC+5:30, JM Garg wrote: > > Thanks, Maanas ji > > -- > With regards, > J. M. Garg > > On Wed, 28 Oct, 2020, 4:28 pm maanas vibhu, > wrote: > >> This is Echinocactus

Re: [efloraofindia:363568] Fwd: Cactus For ID : Nasik : 050714 : AK-8

Thanks Garg Ji. Will try searching further. Regards, Aarti On Wednesday, October 28, 2020 at 11:48:31 AM UTC+5:30, JM Garg wrote: > > Looks somewhat close to *Mammillaria glassii* R.A. Foster >

[efloraofindia:363567] Re: Cactus For ID : Nasik : 050714 : AK-8

Gurcharan Ji, Thanks for bringing up this post. Regards, Aarti On Monday, October 26, 2020 at 2:05:10 PM UTC+5:30, Gurcharan Singh wrote: > > Forwarding again for ID > Distributed as Unidentified Cacti at Nasik >

[efloraofindia:363566] Re: Tree for ID : Atlanta, Georgia : 15JAN19 : AK-27

Gurcharan Ji, Thanks for bringing up this post and suggesting Ulmus parviflora. Regards, Aarti On Tuesday, October 27, 2020 at 11:58:08 AM UTC+5:30, Gurcharan Singh wrote: > > Forwarding again for ID > Distributed as Ulmus species- Atlanta, Georgia, USA >

Re: [efloraofindia:363564] Fwd: SK408 06MAR-2017:ID

I think looks different as per https://www.pacificbulbsociety.org/pbswiki/index.php/Griffinia On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 at 11:28, Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Forwarding again for ID > Distributed as Unidentified China- Beijing plants >

Re: [efloraofindia:363562] Re: Cactus For ID : Mahabaleshwar : 080714 : AK-13

Yes, possible as per http://www.llifle.com/Encyclopedia/CACTI/Family/Cactaceae/5362/Mammillaria_albicans_subs._fraileana We have one similar species at *Mammillaria grahamii* Engelmann , posted

Re: [efloraofindia:363560] Begonia Species for ID : Nasik : 26OCT20 : AK-46

Thank you Mr. Garg ! Saroj Kasaju On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 4:27 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks, Saroj ji, for the id. > Yes, appears close as per Wikimedia Commons > : > >

Re: [efloraofindia:363560] 8 Identify Commelina weed plant

Thank you Mr. Garg ! Saroj Kasaju On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 5:19 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks, Saroj ji, for the id. > Yes, appears close o images at Zeuxine longilabris > > > --

Re: [efloraofindia:363558] Fwd: Flower for Id ( from Bhutan) - ID15032018SH2

It is my pleasure . Thank you Shobha Ji ! Saroj Kasaju On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 5:52 PM Shobha Halwe-Chavda wrote: > Thanks Saroj Ji, > Regards > > On Sunday, 25 October 2020 19:32:55 UTC+5:30, Saroj Kumar Kasaju wrote: >> >> >> My pleasue. >> Thank you Gurucharan sir. >> Saroj Kasaju >> >> On

[efloraofindia:363558] Re: Re: SK872 22 NOV-2017:ID

Sorry Mr. Garg. Images were shot by son by mobile ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 4:15 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Hi, Saroj ji, > Pl. post high resolution images to check the details. > > It appears possible as per FoC illustration >

Re: [efloraofindia:363558] Fwd: Flower for Id ( from Bhutan) - ID15032018SH2

Thanks Saroj Ji, Regards On Sunday, 25 October 2020 19:32:55 UTC+5:30, Saroj Kumar Kasaju wrote: > > > My pleasue. > Thank you Gurucharan sir. > Saroj Kasaju > > On Sun, 25 Oct 2020 at 7:46 pm, Gurcharan Singh > wrote: > >> Thanks Saroj ji >> I think you are right. >> >> >> >> >> Dr. Gurcharan

[efloraofindia:363556] Re: Ixora Species for ID : Lalbagh, Bangalore : 15MAY20 : AK-4

Beautiful. A very rare variety. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to indiantreepix+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the

Re: [efloraofindia:363554] Cactus for ID : Lalbagh Botanical Garden Nursery, Bangalore : 17OCT20 : AK-26

Thanks, Maanas ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Wed, 28 Oct, 2020, 4:28 pm maanas vibhu, wrote: > This is Echinocactus grusonii. > > The plants have been artificially coloured. > > On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 at 15:36, J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Forwarding again for Id assistance please. >> >> Some

Re: [efloraofindia:363553] Cactus for ID : Lalbagh Botanical Garden Nursery, Bangalore : 17OCT20 : AK-26

This is Echinocactus grusonii. The plants have been artificially coloured. On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 at 15:36, J.M. Garg wrote: > Forwarding again for Id assistance please. > > Some earlier relevant feedback: > > Pl. check comparative images at Cactaceae >

Re: [efloraofindia:363552] Begonia Species for ID : Nasik : 26OCT20 : AK-46

Thanks, Saroj ji, for the id. Yes, appears close as per Wikimedia Commons : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Star_Begonia_(Begonia_heracleifolia)_(3072509397).jpg

[efloraofindia:363551] Re: Re: SK872 22 NOV-2017:ID

Hi, Saroj ji, Pl. post high resolution images to check the details. It appears possible as per FoC illustration Checklist of Nepal POWO

[efloraofindia:363549] Re: SK 2782 15 October 2020

This was in the wild near to Phulchoki hill! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 3:37 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Any chance of this being near habitation? > > On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 at 15:17, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > >> Jasminum caudatum Wall. ex Lindl. >>

[efloraofindia:363548] Re: SK 2782 15 October 2020

Any chance of this being near habitation? On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 at 15:17, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > Jasminum caudatum Wall. ex Lindl. >

[efloraofindia:363547] Re: SK 2782 15 October 2020

Jasminum caudatum Wall. ex Lindl. Jasminum caudatum Wall. ex Lindl.

[efloraofindia:363546] Re: Isodon repens (Wall. ex Benth.) Murata

Thank you Dr. Chunlei for the ID validation. I do not know how many sp. are found in Kathmandu valley out of listed 14 sp. in Nepal but I have found 7 sp. in the valley ! Saroj Kasaju On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 2:21 PM 向春雷 wrote: > Hallo, Saroj Kasaju: > > > Yes, it is Isodon repens. Are

Re: [efloraofindia:363545] PM1 2-10-2018 tree id from chandigarh

Difficult to say. On Wed, 28 Oct 2020, 14:00 J.M. Garg, wrote: > Forwarding again for Id assistance please. > > Some earlier relevant feedback: > > Lauraceae ?? > Thank you. > Saroj Kasaju > > > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Pardeep Mor > Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2018 at 23:52 >

Re: [efloraofindia:363544] Re: Silene indica Roxb. ex Otth

Thank you Mr. Garg. Shall we keep them as separate sp. like my last years' post ? Silene indica var. edgeworthii (Bocquet) Y.J.Nasir Saroj Kasaju On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 1:55 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Yes, appears close to Silene indica var. edgeworthii >

[efloraofindia:363542] Re: SK 2782 15 October 2020

I checked Jasminum species as per Checklist of Nepal in GBIF. I think it appears close to *Jasminum caudatum *Wall. ex Lindl. as per GBIF

[efloraofindia:363541] Re: SK 2793 19 October 2020

Thank you Mr. Garg ! I think you are right ! Saroj Kasaju On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 12:35 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > I checked relevant species in GBIF as per Checklist of Nepal > > I think it is close to *Cardamine yunnanensis

Re: [efloraofindia:363540] Re: Silene indica Roxb. ex Otth

Yes, appears close to Silene indica var. edgeworthii as per images and details herein. On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 at 13:36, J.M. Garg wrote: > Looks different from Silene indica >

Re: [efloraofindia:363539] Re: Silene indica Roxb. ex Otth

Looks different from Silene indica as per images herein. On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 at 18:11, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > > Thank you Mahadeswra JI. So far ID is kept as Silene indica Roxb. ex Otth > only. > >

[efloraofindia:363538] Posted in 2010, 2013, 2014, 2017 and published as new species in 2020

Dear members, Posted in 2010 in Pravin Kawale ji, in 2013 by Narendra Joshi ji, in 2014 by Prashant Awale ji and in 2017 by Alka Khare ji and in 2019 by Dinesh Valke ji in efloraofindia, is now published as *Echinops sahyadricus* Sushant More, Fabio Conti & Harshal S. Bhosale

Fwd: [efloraofindia:363537] Fwd: Echinops echinatus

*Echinops sahyadricus* as per images and details herein and as per discussions and details at Echinops echinatus- Kate Chendu- PKA-Dec01

[efloraofindia:363534] Re: SK 2793 19 October 2020

I checked relevant species in GBIF as per Checklist of Nepal I think it is close to *Cardamine yunnanensis *Franch. as per GBIF

Re: [efloraofindia:363534] Malhargad near Pune, MH :: Leucas longifolia for validation :: ARK2020-101

Thank you Saroj ji for validating. Regards Alka Khare On Wednesday, October 28, 2020 at 11:09:20 AM UTC+5:30, Saroj Kumar Kasaju wrote: > > Correct ID ! > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 11:10 AM Alka Khare > wrote: > >> Hello friends >> >> Seen this Leucas at

[efloraofindia:363532] Re: SK 2796 20 October 2020 - Grass

Ok -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Wed, 28 Oct, 2020, 11:38 am Saroj Kasaju, wrote: > Sorry Mr. Garg . I missed your mail. > This is Capillipedium assimile (Steud.) A.Camus ! > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 11:38 AM J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Hi, Saroj ji, >>

Re: [efloraofindia:363531] Fwd: Cactus For ID : Nasik : 050714 : AK-8

Looks somewhat close to *Mammillaria glassii* R.A. Foster On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 at 11:47, J.M. Garg wrote: > I do not think so as per > >

Re: [efloraofindia:363530] Fwd: Cactus For ID : Nasik : 050714 : AK-8

I do not think so as per https://www.cactus-art.biz/schede/MAMMILLARIA/Mammillaria_geminispina/Mammillaria_geminispina/mammillaria_geminispina.htm On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 at 14:13, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > Mammillaria geminispina Haw. ?? > Syn : Mammillaria elegans DC. > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju >

[efloraofindia:363529] Re: SK 2796 20 October 2020 - Grass

Sorry Mr. Garg . I missed your mail. This is Capillipedium assimile (Steud.) A.Camus ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 11:38 AM J.M. Garg wrote: > Hi, Saroj ji, > Capillipedium assimile or Capillipedium parviflorum ? > > On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 at 11:30, J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Hi,

[efloraofindia:363528] Re: SK 2806 23 October 2020 - Mycophyta

Did not find match ! Thank you Mr. Garg ! Saroj Kasaju On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 11:49 AM J.M. Garg wrote: > Check in Boletaceae > > > On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 at 13:32, J.M. Garg

[efloraofindia:363527] Re: SK 2806 23 October 2020 - Mycophyta

Check in Boletaceae On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 at 13:32, J.M. Garg wrote: > Forwarding again for Id assistance please. > > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Saroj